My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
01-11-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
8/12/2025 10:40:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
1/11/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/12/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
398
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Planning Commissior. <br />FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant 'oning Administrator <br />DATB: May 17, 1985 <br />SUHJBC'1': #910 James Hoff, 2055 Shadywood Road - Con- anal <br />Use Permit <br />Zoning District - LR-I(' <br />Application - Regrade Lakeshore Yard of Property, All Within <br />0-75' Setback Area <br />B:isting Grade - Uniform Slope of about 38% from high plateau down <br />to lake <br />Proposed Grade - 24-30% slope <br />List of B:Aibits <br />Exhibit A - Application <br />Exhibit B - Plat Map <br />Exhibit C - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit D - Survey with existing and proposed contours <br />The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow him to <br />degrade the lakeshore of his property so that it confrarn q to the <br />properties on either side of him. Most of the work p:-r!: within <br />the 0-75' setbick area. His existing slope is about . ding to <br />the exi Ling ^rade topog.�phi.c _ bmittal. The ri _ would <br />decrease the slo, o ab,,ut 25 on the average, but would eA...ainate the <br />flat plateau whi urrently acts as runoff percolation are . <br />City Engineer, ';l 7ook, has reviewed the proposal and wade these <br />.me*ant s <br />1. The proposed rs as shown do not accomplish the stated <br />purpose of conft. - gto jhboring property-nntours. Note <br />that tno property tc the , s exten s i ve reta we l I?;. How <br />wil' the grading confo ' hese? On the so..th side, where <br />slopes are less severe. ld likely require less removal of <br />rateria! . conform to th- !ighboring grades. <br />2. The pr <br />"Plat, <br />rune <br />t <br />is <br />cho , <br />a will eliminate tna existing 30-40' <br />ors or less, which now functions as slow- <br />,.rea, and change the entire lakeshore yard <br />t -om a runoff infilt, ation stan('point, this <br />a..y % beneficial project. One-third of the <br />ir).cn.irly hac. relativarly good infiltration <br />sys, wii.' -»- reduced it infiltration capacity. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.