Laserfiche WebLink
� Clt of ORONO <br /> � <br /> • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. /��_3 9 <br /> • - • • <br /> 42. There is an existing 20 X 40 greenhouse on the property <br /> not currently in use except for storage purposes. <br /> 43. Addition of a delicatessen or any retail space would be <br /> an expansion of the non-conforming use and an addition to <br /> the bulk of a non-conforming use building, both of which <br /> are contrary to the letter and intent of Sections 31. 108 & 31. 109 . <br /> 44 . "Use" variances to allow uses not permitted by the zoning <br /> ' code are forbidden by Minnesota law (462 . 357 Subd. 6 (1) ) . <br /> 45 . Commercial greenhouses are permitted by conditional use <br /> permit in the RR-1B district per Section 34 . 025, subject to <br /> all the health, safety, welfare and comprehensive� planning <br /> considerations given any conditional use permit review. No <br /> such greenhouse permit has ever been issued for this property. <br /> • 46 . The 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Plan and the 1980 <br /> Community Management Plan both identify the entire neighborhood <br /> around this intersection as rural-residential with no commercial <br /> use desired. Both plans recommend concentration of commercial <br /> activities in the established centers of Long Lake, rlaple Plain, <br /> and Navarre . <br /> 47 . In addition to the principal market building, there exists <br /> on this property a sma11 trailer (mobile home) occupied by two <br /> persons as a permanent residence having a separate septic system <br /> and sharing a well water supply with the store. <br /> 48 . On October 8, 1980 , a new site plan and proposal letter <br /> was received by the City, reviewed by staff and the Council <br /> on October 14 , 1980. <br /> a) The new plan calls for a 40 X 50 detached greenhouse <br /> rather than attached as originally proposed. <br /> b) The new structure meets required setbacks . <br /> • c) An outdoor display and sales area is located in the 50 ft. <br /> required front setback area but farther removed from the <br /> highway than the existing outdoor sales . <br /> d) The new plan calls for closing of access onto Highway 12 <br /> with all access being from County Road 6 , although <br /> . Wisegarver has stated that he wishes to retain the <br /> Highway 12 access. <br /> Page 8 of 17 <br />