Laserfiche WebLink
J�"� <br /> 7 . ��> <br /> . �_. <br /> ., �.�, <br /> �� <br /> . ,. <br /> • RESOLUTION NO. 1231 <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GRANTING OF A DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY <br /> � EASEMENT OVER LOT 3, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 265, HENNEPIN COUNTY, <br /> . MINNESOTA. <br /> ' WHEREAS,, Richard Lorge is the owner of property known as <br /> Lot 3, Auditor' s Su�division No. 265, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter Lot 3) ; and <br /> _ WHERFAS, Richard Lorge sold Lot 4, Auditor' s Subdivision <br /> No. 26'S, �Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter Lot 4) to Jerome <br /> M. �cir�az an� BY�a��Yi I. Fcinan c�n 3�ay 29, 198u; and <br /> � 1�HEREAS,, Reinan is now selling Lot 4 to Mr. and Mrs. A. L. <br /> Kane; and � <br /> WHEREAS, Lorge has stated to the City Council that at the <br /> time of the sale of Lot 4 to Reinan, he promised that some time in <br /> the future a driveway and utilities easement would be granted to <br /> Lot 4 over Lot 3 out to Casco Point Road at a location where the <br /> present driveway exits over Lot 3; and � <br /> • WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Kane and Mr. Lorge and Mr. Reinan all <br /> individually and jointly desire to have the City approve of the <br /> granting of the easements, described further in Exhibit A attached <br /> hereto; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has � <br /> previously reviewed a separate application by Mr. Lorge seeking <br /> several variances to allow Lot 3 to be a buildable lot; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council has indicated to Mr. Lorge at the <br /> City Council Meeting of November 10, 1980, that the City Council <br /> does not at this time believe Lot 3 was buildable since it was in <br /> common ownersnip with Lot 4 and since L'ne Orono zoning code <br /> specifically prohibited the building on a substandard lot when that <br /> � substandard lot at one time was held in common ownership with an <br /> adjacent substandard lot as was the case with Lot 3 and 4 when they <br /> were in common ownership by Mr. Lorge and the City Council also <br /> expressed numerous other concerns about the bui:ldability of Lot 3 <br /> and directed staff to investigate the facts further; <br /> NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: <br /> 1. That the City Council approves of the granting of the <br /> driveway and utility easemerits pursuant to" the terms set forth in <br /> Exhibit A attached hereto. <br /> • <br />