Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No, /oy� <br /> Page 53 � <br /> � ' ' . <br /> In addition to recommended use of the pro ert <br /> alternative has also been included to roP• y' an " <br /> flexibility to the Cit P ide more <br /> following is the recommendationnofathecconsu• �e <br /> . ltant: <br /> A• Rezone the Site for LR-lA Lakeshore Residential D' <br /> Based upon �he rrevious analysis related to future lalstrict - <br /> and development of the Cit p nning <br /> the site be rezoned gor a y °f Orono, it is recommended that <br /> single-family dwelling for several <br /> reasons. For one, the land uses in the area consist of sin <br /> family dwellings and lake cottages and the g1e- <br /> proposed development policies for the „lt �Xisting and � <br /> area as a rural area with low-densit ^ y is to retain this � <br /> � in the foreseeable future. Y residential development <br /> development would be in confor�nuanceltoltheaexistresidential ' <br /> proposed development policies of the �it ing and <br /> residential land use on this site would y� Secondly, a <br /> impact on the need for urban services, trafficaproblems <br /> • and potential pollution problems in this area . Third a <br /> residential land use would be co�npatible with the nei hborh <br /> and general area and could improve the aesthetics of ghe °od <br /> and `the Stubbs Bay shoreline with the removal of the exi <br /> area <br /> slips , sting <br /> , Admittedly, the site is not ideal for residential de <br /> . due to the fact that the site is located in the floodelopment <br /> and portions of the site are located in a sheet flow area <br /> . Thus, the site would have to be modified Plain <br /> proofing the building. In addition, a holding rtankf�,,00d- . � <br /> have to be used for the sanitar ould <br /> pollution problems . However, weighing alltthetfactorSize � <br /> considered in this analysis a � <br /> be the recommended use of the Single-family residence would <br /> q property. <br /> � . <br />