My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 1099
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
1963 - 2024 _ Resolutions 0001-7547
>
Reso 1000 - 1099 (February 27, 1979 - December 11, 1979)
>
Resolution 1099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2015 11:37:25 AM
Creation date
11/12/2015 11:37:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� �Xfr���� �"�.�. - � <br /> �E,S'o� , �=9 <br /> I , RECOl✓i•�1�DATIOI� <br /> • Based upon- the ioregoing, I recommend to the City Council that the � <br /> property com:nonly known as Stubbs Bay �i�rina (legally described as <br /> Block 7 , Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka and Lots 21 and 22, <br /> Auditor' s Subdivision No. 203) be zoned and restricted for use as <br /> io ert District LR-lA, consistent <br /> One Family Lak eshore Residential p ' p Y� • <br /> with the zoning designation and actual use of all surrounding properties . <br /> I support �his recotr�nendation with my conclusion ,as a professional . <br /> planner that this zoning designation is � entirelyhensive�Plansland�h e <br /> goals , intents and purposes of the Ci�y s Compre <br /> that any other designation is inconsistent with those goals , intents <br /> and purposes . � <br /> I further reco�nend to the City Council that the future develop�nent � <br /> and use of the subject property be restricted and limited to those <br /> permitted and conditional uses specified as appropriate uses for the <br /> LR-lA zoning use district. <br /> I su�port this recomm�ndation with my conclusion as a professional <br /> planner that said permitted uses are indeed appropriate for this <br /> property given all neighborhood, topographic, geographic, ecological, <br /> �historic and legal restrictions imposed on the property by its very <br /> • location and intrinsic characteristics and that all other uses , <br /> including limited co�u�ercial use as a marina, are infact inappropriate <br /> for the property and the neighborhood. <br /> II. COURSE OF ACTION • <br /> The Council' s first responsibility is to accept the many reports and <br /> recommendations prepared on this subject and to hear the comments <br /> and recommendations 'of the property owners, neighbors and public at <br /> large. . <br /> � I recommend that after receipt of all facts nndfuPure zoninge City <br /> Council adopt a RESOLUTION OF INTENT regardi g <br /> development and use of this property. This resolution would be <br /> conceptual in nature, allowing staff an opportunity to include all <br /> � new information received at thetpublic hearing, to include exactly <br /> � all findings of the Council and to ensure that the final resolution <br /> be correct in detail prior to passage at the next meeting. I have <br /> attached a suggested draft of such a 'resolution. <br /> I recommend that the Council amend the 1974 Comprehensive Plan <br /> � consistent with the findings of this moratorium area study. <br /> � � � . <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.