My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 1099
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
1963 - 2024 _ Resolutions 0001-7547
>
Reso 1000 - 1099 (February 27, 1979 - December 11, 1979)
>
Resolution 1099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2015 11:37:25 AM
Creation date
11/12/2015 11:37:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. . �XNf6�T Z-� <br /> - . �z ESo� . /09 <br /> PI ANNING COMA9ISSION CO;�,��SEI�'TS - FEBRUARY 26, 1979 <br /> � <br /> GREGG HANNAH . ' <br /> Exclusive of professional opinion, cahich I have not seen really, ' <br /> I am very intrigued by the way the architect has made use of the � <br /> site and I am very encouraged by the fact that the restrictive <br /> covenants would set a ceiling on the amount of corru-nercial business <br /> that would occur on the site. I think it certainly is the most <br /> attractive use of this site that I have seen presented to date. � <br /> GLORIA MCDONALD <br /> No Co;�m�ent <br /> STEVEN WILSON ' • � � <br /> I . thi�k the construction of °a marina in �Stubbs Bay is not consistent <br /> with the� residential nature of the area and I am concerned that the <br /> boat traffic coming out of ri3xwe11 Bay with two marinas there would be <br /> � inereased because Stubbs Bay' s only access is out through Maxwell <br /> Bay and I think that is a major traffic problem. I am also concerned <br /> � about the nature of Stubbs Bay as a small shallow bay and with too <br /> much boat traffie it will take the use of the bay away from the <br /> residents . I am supportive of Alan Olson' s recommendation for a <br /> dotan-zoning and denial of the application. � <br /> � TOM FRAHM � <br /> - I think most of the writing I have seen here is concerned with sewage. _ <br /> � and �either way, wheth er we allow a single family dwelling� or -a marina <br /> on the site, there" will "b'e a need for holding tanks and pumping so it . <br />' . really has no bearing on either choice. Either way it will not harm <br /> anything. The two problems as I see� them are mainly- traffic, both � <br /> boat and car traffic. I guess at this point I am not enougli of an <br /> expert to say whether either one of them will have any� major effect . � <br /> on the area. I tend to think not. I am kind of worried about <br /> eliminating� marinas as much as I would � like to see traffic on the lake <br /> down, - I believe there is a big push by Hennepin County and the State <br /> of Minnesota to make Lake Minnetonka more accessible to the general <br /> pnblic, and if we start eliminating marinas and accesses to the lake, <br /> I think we will be forced 'into �something that will be a lot less <br /> favorable that what we have now. I guess I am in favor 'of the marina <br /> being permitted. � � , � <br /> � . � . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.