Laserfiche WebLink
owner should not see a rise because of the shift because the <br />monies are transferred as aid to the school districts and their <br />local effort 'mill rate" (i.e. tax capacity rate) is reduced from <br />29.1% to 26.4%. (See Attachment B.) Since the City loses all of <br />its State Aids and NACA, there is no longer a penalty for <br />exceeding its levy limit. As exceeding the limits however would <br />still be illegal it is an option but not a recommended one. <br />Issue 94 - Minnesota's Property Tax SUst�em - Attachment C is a <br />g rapl-i is repcesanta�.o o M nnesota s rather complicated property <br />tax system. It illustrates the pre session and post session <br />changes. This will be "explained" during the budget eview <br />process. <br />Issue #5 - reliminary Resolution Adoption - The special session <br />T—eTsf—ature requlced a opt on of a new evy resolution as the <br />figures changed. This is the n:+mber to be published in the ad <br />required to be in the paper as a result of the Truth in Taxation. <br />The resolution is required to be transmitted to the County by <br />11/15. While the total dollars to the City increases by 18.5%, <br />the shift causes the levy to increase by 10.3%. This is about a <br />1.8% overall increase to the taxpayer, 1.01 which will be offset <br />by monies to reduce the School district levy. The City retains <br />the option to reduce from the maximum that is established or <br />amend where the money is spent. <br />Issue t6 - Scheduling Public Nearing - As part of the Truth in <br />Taxation, the C ty s requrreed to establish both a public bearing <br />date and a reconvening date that does not coincide with other <br />overlapping taxing jurisdictions such as the Cuunty and various <br />school districts. Given that the regular Council meeting nights <br />of 11/27 and 12/11 are already taken by school districts, other <br />nights must be scheduled. (Tt: County gave the County and school <br />districts first choice. O:,ce they were established, then the <br />County sent Attachment F to let cities establish theirs. <br />Suggested dates include: <br />November 30, 1989, 7:00 p.m. <br />Cscember 12, 1989, 7:00 p.m. <br />Reconvene if necessary <br />(The reconveining date is required to be established even if not <br />used.) The hearings together with final resolution adoption must <br />he completed and transmitted to the County ty 12/28/89.) <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Accept the information. <br />2. Make an} comments applicable. <br />3. Table discussion until facilities and/or further budget <br />meetings. <br />4. Adopt the resolution as presented. <br />