My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
11-13-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
8/4/2025 12:47:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
11/13/1989
Retention Effective Date
8/4/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE /1468-PILLSBURY CONTINUED <br />Planning Commissioner Brown questioned whether the City <br />Engineer had reviewed the drainage concept being proposed? <br />Gaffron repi.-led that the City Engineer had only conceptually <br />approved of the )lan, but had not received the plans in time to <br />fully review ther.. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows said that the drainage and <br />addition are really two separate issues. <br />Planning Commissioner Johnson asked whether the sketch plan <br />showed existing or proposed plantingE? <br />Mr. Baldwin explained that he was going to try to preserve <br />the desireable plants on the bank and then supplement them with <br />more plantings that would help prevent erosion. <br />Chairman Kelley asked what is the hardship for the variance <br />in this case? <br />Mr. Baldwin said that it was the applicant's intention to <br />have a plant room that has the kind of sun orientation necessary. <br />In the process of constructing the addition, they will address <br />the problems with the existing grades and drainage on the <br />property. <br />Mr. Meyer explained the scheme of the existing house in <br />relation to the need to locate the greenhouse as proposed. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows said that she understood that <br />the greenhouse would be used for growing orchids. She said that <br />an orchid house is more sensitive than a regular greenhouse. Sh-, <br />said that the orchids need a more southeast orientation rather <br />than south or southwest. <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson suggested that the greenhouse <br />addition be shorter so that it would rot extend toward the lake <br />to the degree now proposed. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding th-J- matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />Planning Commissioner Johnson said that he did not have a <br />problem with the hardcover, even though it is in the 0-75' <br />setback zone, due in part because the slope to the lake is so <br />steep that any runoff goes directly to the lake. He questioned <br />whether a grading plan had been sul-mitted7 <br />Mr. Baldwin said that he wculd work with staff to establish <br />limitations for the amount of grading that the City will allow. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown Poted that there would be a new <br />2 foot retaining wall. He informea Mr. Baldwin that the City is <br />sensitive of the visual aspect of retaining walls and that <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.