Laserfiche WebLink
26, DO ANY HISTORICAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES EXIST ON OR NEAR THE <br />PROJECT SITE? IF YES, EXPLAIN (SHOW RESOURCES ON A SITE MAP XND ONOCRI3E IMPACT)• <br />The State Historic Preservation Officer has stated that the project location has <br />no recorded sites of architectural, historic, cultural or engineering significance <br />and that while no known archeological sites are within the project area, further <br />study will be conducted. (See Exhibit F). <br />27, WILL THE PROJECT CAUSE THE IMPAIRMENT OR DESTRUCTION OF: <br />A. <br />DESIGNATED PARK OR RECREATION AREAS? <br />X NO <br />NO <br />YES <br />X YES <br />8, <br />PRIME OR UNIQUE FARMLANDS? <br />X NO <br />YES <br />C. <br />ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREAS? <br />X NO <br />YES <br />D. <br />SCENIC VIEWS AND VISTAS? <br />X NO <br />YES <br />E. <br />OTHER UNI:UZ RESOURCES (SPECIFY)? <br />IF YES, EXPLAIN: <br />Based upon the types of soils in the area, 11.7 acres of land along the proposed <br />CR 116 alignment is classified as either prime farmland or farmlands of statewide <br />importance. However, 8 acres have already been utilized for existing roads. The <br />remaining 3.7 acres of affected farmland occurs along the proposed new alignment. <br />Prime and important farmlands occur throughout this area. Therefore, an alignment <br />change would be ineffective to avoid this situation. <br />26. FOP. EACH AFFECTED ROAD, INDICATE THE CURRENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT), INCREASE <br />IN AOT CONTRIBUTED BY THE PROJECT AND THE DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF TRAFFIC. <br />The current (1986-87) ADT for Willow Drive and Medina Road are 1,437 vpd and 77 <br />vpd respectively. The projected 2010 ADT fur CR 116 range from 2000 vpd to 3000 <br />vpd. See attached Transportation Analysis for details (Exhibit H). <br />29. ARE ADEQUATE UTILITIES AND PUBIC SERVICE NOW AVAILABLE TO SERVICE THE PROJECT? <br />IF NOT, WHAT ADDITIONAL UTILITIES AND/OR SERVICES WILL BE REQUIRED? X YES <br />SUMMARY OF ISSUES: <br />FOR REGULAR EAWS, LIST THE ISSUES AS IDENTIFIED BY 'YES" ANSWERS ABOVE, DISCUSS <br />ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATIVE MEASURES FOR THESE ISSUES. FOR SCOPING EAWS, LIST <br />KNOWN ISSUES, ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATIVE MEASURES TO BE ADDRESSED IN EIS. <br />16. Peat removed from the roadbed will be disposed of in a suitable manner. <br />18b. Minimum elevations for the new roadway will be at least 3 feet above the 100 <br />year flood elevation at each location. Drainage culverts shall be large <br />enough to continue the na*ural flow of surface water under the new roadway. <br />22a. The surface and storm water runoff will be redirected along roadway ditches <br />until it can resume it's natural drainage Dattern. <br />-6- <br />