Laserfiche WebLink
long predicted recession sometime in 1990. Some maintain we are <br />currently going through a rolling recession or depression as <br />there are sectors of the economy which are hit for various <br />reasons such as the energy downturn for the last four or five <br />years following downturns in the 'rust belt'. <br />As is true with the national economy, the Minnesota economy <br />particularly in the tletro area has continued to expand. The <br />problem however, has been a growing sentiment for taxpaver revolt <br />particularily regarding property taxes. The Minnesota Mi-acle <br />which was initiated in the early '70's, has now ',.!come a victim <br />of its own success. The Legislature continues co use b:ndaids <br />attempting to solve the expenditure driven formulas, particularly <br />in trying to keep taxes down in the Out State aria. This <br />complicated system however, has become unpredice-ibl-. Property <br />tax reform that was passed in 1988 fur 1989 resulted in tax <br />increases, not only in the Metro suburban area, but in the areas <br />Out State that are substantially more than Legislators had <br />anticipated. This caused the 1989 Legislature to moderate these <br />Increases by additional State monies being poured into property <br />tax relief together with making the levy limits and expenditures <br />as tight as possible for local units of government. This attempt <br />was hoped to have property taxes at a palatable level for 1990 in <br />advance of the 1990 elections. It was anticipated that the 1990 <br />Legislature will work to get money into programs that they have <br />hell back on in '89 ir. hopes of making a positive impression on <br />property taxpayers together with constituent support groups that <br />have not received much during 1989. With the Governor's veto <br />and possible special session which may undertake a substantial <br />change in direction for 1990, this may be significantly altered. <br />Regardless of a sepcial session a significant recession in the <br />latter part of '89 into the early part of '90 may cause <br />substantial problems in funding these relief and expenditure <br />measures. <br />For Orono the tight levy limit is exacerbated by the need for <br />selected expenditure increases during 1990. This will result in <br />a rather tight budget year in 1990. t. recession may materialize <br />because of higher interest rates, at least in the Musing sector. <br />This could cause a downturn in construction activity as could a <br />general recession. Price increases ire current items primarily in <br />the energy sector will translate into unit costs for these <br />products that are higher than the race of inflation. <br />GOALS - Primary budgetary goals for 1990 include: <br />- Continued utilization of a capital budget framework <br />which may include the following projects for 1990: <br />Old Crystal Bay/Bridge Replacement <br />North Ferndale/MSA <br />Willow Drive/Seal Coacing <br />Projects in either 1989 or 1990 <br />Negotiations still continue between the Governor and Legislature. <br />A target date for agreement was set for September 30, 1989. If <br />no agreement is reached there may be no session this fall. If no <br />special Session it is expected that refunds for 1990 will comv to <br />property owners in advance of the 1990 election as a result of <br />the regular 1990 Legislative session. <br />The economy continues to grow with fears of an 'e9 recession <br />significantly diminished. Construction activity in Orono for <br />1989 is ahead of the same time in 1988. <br />