Laserfiche WebLink
r� <br />D) The neighbor's request for the lakeshore setback <br />and average setback variances to allow for the least <br />disruptive sightlines, to maintain uniformity, and the <br />capability to direct all drainage over 100' of <br />relatively flat lawn area, justify the granting of a <br />variance to the lakeshore setback. <br />E) The unique characteristics of the property, i.e. <br />the proposed building site separated from the rest of <br />the property by a lagoon, constitutes a valid hardship <br />to the property. <br />F) The variances can be granted without permanent <br />crediting of the lot area north of the lagoon. <br />5. The City Council in reviewing this parcel finde *hat the <br />property taken ir. •.s entirety, including area north of the <br />lagoon, meets or --eeds the 1 acre : -)t area requirements <br />for the LR-lB Zor.iag District. <br />6. The City Council has considered this application <br />including the findings and recomnendat-_ons of the Planning <br />Commission, reports by City staff, com*.gents by the applicant <br />and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, <br />safety and welfare of the community. <br />7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br />this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally <br />to other property in this zo^ing district; that granting the <br />variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br />light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br />neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br />a demonstrable hardsnip or difficulty; is necessary to <br />preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br />would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br />Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />