Laserfiche WebLink
TO: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City ?;,Iministrator Bernhardson <br />From: Michael P. Caffron, Asst Planning & 'Zoning Administrator <br />Date: Auqust 14, 1987 <br />Suhject: 01174 Craiq Andersen, 375 Leaf Street/3300 Bayside Road - <br />Preliminary Plat - Second Review <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Revised Preliminary Plat Drawing <br />Exhibit B - Sketch with Staff Recommendations <br />Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibits of 7/15/87 <br />Exhibit D - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/20/87 <br />Discussion - <br />Appiicant has provided a relatively complete preliminary plat drawing <br />as cr 8/14/87. Proposed dimensions, house sites, septic sites, and <br />driveway locations are shown. The appropriate easements for floodplain, <br />drainageways, and drainage and utilities along lot lines, have been shown. <br />Site Planning - <br />necause this is a very unique property, it is appropriate to address <br />individual site plgnning durina this subdivision review, although in most <br />vtho�r relatively simple plats we would not be as concerned with house arn9 <br />drivcwiy locations. <br />Lot 1 - Is the most critical b^cause it contains some unusually steep <br />Hirt^^ and a major drainagew1}•. The two septic sites as shown on the <br />staff sketch are acceptable and functional, and will not affect any <br />nrinhhorinq wells. Neither site will be affected by driveway location, <br />n 1 *h(ieinh ,tnf. f suggests that the driveway continue to the house site <br />dir^ctly north of septic site 2 instead of swinging easterly towards septic <br />si,• 1 (nee staff sketch). <br />under the applicant's proposed configuration, the house site is very <br />) im, • •,ci by septic to the south, the new lot line to the north-east, and the <br />tit) ^I 1•mbankment on the northwest. Staff would suggest that the lot line <br />rove ^nst^rly as r_hown, leaving approximately 2.3 buildable acres in Lot 1 <br />.in,' buildable acres in Lot 2. This will give much more flexibility in <br />'in-i­ rl nc e�ment on Lot 1 in consideration of the 30' required side setback, <br />bu• will not appreciably affect the buildabi1ity of Lot 2. <br />