My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 7/24/1989
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 7/24/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:48 AM
Creation date
7/15/2025 11:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
7/24/1989
Retention Effective Date
7/15/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Frcai* Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: July 1, 1989 <br />Subject: #1416 Jeffrey Eccles, 3025 Sixth Avenue North - <br />Variance - Continued Public ^'^aring <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Revised Survey <br />Exhibit B - House Layout <br />Exhibit C - Notice of Planning Commission Action of 6/22/89 <br />Exhibit D - Letter from Neighboring Affected Property Owner <br />Exhibit E - Memo & Exhibits of 6/13/89 <br />Discussion - <br />This item was tabled at your June 19th meeting pending a <br />revised plan which accurately depicts applicant's proposed <br />construction. Such a plan has been submitted, along with a <br />layout of the existing house. <br />Note that the garage has been down-sized to 26*x26' instead <br />of 30'x30*. This reduces the required setback variance. Thai <br />proposal is for a 15.2* side setback where a 30* side setback <br />would normally be required. <br />At the June meeting, applicant provided a letter frosi tha <br />neighboring affected property owner, stating no objection to tha <br />earlier proposal. <br />Staff RecosBiendation - <br />A recommendation for approval could be supported by the <br />following findings: <br />1. Minimal visual impact on the neighborhood. <br />2. No additional run-off will be directed to the <br />neighboring property. <br />3. The affected neighbor has expressed he has no objection <br />to the proposal. <br />4. New garage will be located in location of existing <br />garage and driveway. <br />5. Othar locations for garage would conflict with well or <br />septic system, or would not be appropriate given traffic <br />pattern of rooms in house. <br />6. Applicant has revised proposal to reduce the size of the <br />garage to minimize the setback variance required.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.