My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 7/24/1989
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 7/24/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:48 AM
Creation date
7/15/2025 11:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
7/24/1989
Retention Effective Date
7/15/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1420 <br />June 14r 1989 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />Proposed <br />Required <br />Variance <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Lot Area <br />0.96 ac <br />(0.90 ac**) <br />1.00 ac <br />.04 ac <br />(.lOac**) <br />LOT 2 <br />Lot Width* <br />300' + <br />140 <br />Existing Hardcover <br />0-75*75-250' <br />11.05% <br />250-500' <br />3.62% <br />0% 25% max. 30% max. <br />(see Item 4*below) <br />** Excluding driveway serving neighbors <br />The proposed dividing line was apparently located as <br />presented for a number of reasons: <br />A) The proposed line leaves exactly 25% hardcover in <br />the 75-250 me for the existing development on Lot 1. <br />B) This 1 . > also leaves a setbaclc of approximately <br />7* to the driveway serving the existing residence. <br />Applicant feels such a setba^jc is appropriate and <br />necessary to maintain the character of his property. <br />Consequently, Lot 2 ends up 0.04 acre short of 1 acre. <br />Technically, the subdivision code definition of <br />requires exclusion of vehicular easements from the definea <br />lot area. Although applicant has not provided documentation <br />of existing easements on the survey, staff must presume that <br />an access easement exists over proposed Lot 2 to serve the <br />residences at 1330 and 1350 Vine Place. The paved area of <br />that private driveway is approximately 2,800 <br />acre, hence the defined proposed lot area for Lot 2 is 0.90 <br />acre or less. <br />Planning Commission may wish uo J^e^iew the <br />definitions in Sec .on 11.03.24 and 10.02.34 and consi .er <br />whether this driveway ma)ces the northerly and southerly <br />portions of Lot 2 non-contiguous. <br />The probable buiIdling site on Lot 2 is north o le <br />driveway, mostly ir the 250-500' <br />250-500' zone fo- Lo * 1 was expanded to make Lot 1 s^su <br />500' zone confo.' ; >rdcover limits, the <br />.ine would mov . th about 65'. On the other hand, if the <br />250-500' hardcc variance for Lot 1 is granted, with the <br />proposed dividing line. Lot 2 would have imple hardcover <br />allowance to develop a residence within the hardcover <br />limits.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.