My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981-05-18 Report of Title Examiner
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Crystal Place
>
3585 Crystal Place - 17-117-23-43-0145 (inc. 3567 Crystal Place)
>
Land Use
>
1981-05-18 Report of Title Examiner
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2025 10:05:50 AM
Creation date
6/26/2025 10:02:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3585
Street Name
Crystal
Street Type
Place
Address
3585 Crystal Place
PIN
1711723430145
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
further proceedings herein, the land dencript.ion found at. P,nr:1J"1-.1J,h <br />1 hereof should be used. <br />(b) Except as barred by the tax lien foreclosure under, which <br />applicant claims title to said Lots 8, 9 and 10, Book 72 of 11Pnn,-pi11 <br />County Records, page 3977984, entry 196, Document No. 4286289, nfrinn <br />of the County Recorder, entry 197 and Document No. 4286290, office <br />of the County Recorder, entry 198, said Lot 10 is owned of record <br />by Elizabeth R. Roth_,Book 1654 of Deeds, page 275, entry 193, subject <br />to the possible claims of the City of Orono and Albert Roth also <br />kncwn as Albert Clarence Roth, entries 194 and 195. Except as barred <br />by said tax lien foreclosures, said Lots 8 and 9 are owned of record <br />by Melvin A. Abel, Book 68 of Hennepin County Records, page 375011'. <br />entry 187. I recommend the aforesaid parties as defendants hercin. <br />(c) The "subject clause" of the Decree should contain the <br />following concluding statement: <br />To a reservation by the State of Minnesota <br />of minerals and mineral rights. <br />(d) The Inspection Report of the County Surveyor on file herein <br />states that a fence possibly encroaches Along the West line of Lot <br />10, which fence is claimed by the owner of Lot 11. Said Inspection <br />Report further states that the occupant of Lot 11 is using a part <br />of Lot 10 for yard purposes. According to the County Surveyor, <br />said Lot 11 is occupied by Delilah Moschini. An examination of <br />the County Recorder's Tract Index reveals that said Lot 11 is owri -' <br />of record by Fudge J. Moschini and Delilah G. Moschini as J-ii,f <br />tenants, Bcok 1736 of Deeds, page 390. There are no other interests <br />of record as to said Lot 11. I therefore recommend said Fudge J. <br />Moschini and Delilah G. Moschini as defendants so that there may <br />be evidence at the hearing to support a finding in the Decree as <br />to ether said fence and yar,- encroachments are maintained as a <br />matte:- of right or merely at sufferance. Any encroachment which <br />is maintained as a matter of right must be shown by an appropriate <br />concluding statement in the "subject clause" of the Decree of Regis- <br />tration. <br />Applicant's attorney should ascertain the names of the occupant <br />of said Lot 11 and if they are other than said rL,,,ord owners, such <br />occupants should be made defendants herein. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.