My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5162
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 0001-7547
>
Reso 5100 - 5199 January 12, 2004 - June 14, 2004)
>
Resolution 5162
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:22 PM
Creation date
11/10/2015 11:25:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� � o� <br /> 0 0 <br /> � �� CITY of ORONO <br /> ,� ;� � � <br /> ti <br /> ��� �Gti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> `�k'ESI��g' NO. S � � � <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1C Single Family Lakeshore Residential <br /> District, which requires a minimum lot area of 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre). <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br /> held on April 19, 2004 and recommended approval of variances based on <br /> the following findings: <br /> a. Due to the topography of the lots the lake views enjoyed by <br /> neighboring property owners will be unaffected by the deck and screen <br /> porch. <br /> b. Due to the topography, views from the lake of the deck and screen <br /> porch will be minimal. <br /> c. The proposal will not have a negative impact on light, air or open <br /> space in the neighborhood. <br /> d. A hardcover variance in the 75'-250' zone is supported by the <br /> following hardship: <br /> i. The existing deck is rotted and needs to be replaced for safety <br /> purposes. <br /> ii. Hardcover is proposed to be reduced on the property from the <br /> current level in the 75'-250' zone of 31.05% to 30%. There is <br /> no additional hardcover that can be reasonably removed. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br /> property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br /> Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.