Laserfiche WebLink
�, <br /> s�,y <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> • �� 3 CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��l ��'~ <br /> `�kEsS�4 ' . NO. Si � � � <br /> A RESOLUTION TO OPPOSE <br /> TAX AND EXPENDITURE LIMITATION PROPOSALS <br /> . (TABOR and Similar Proposals) <br /> WHEREAS, the Taxpayers League and others are endorsing proposals to amend the <br /> State Constitution to institute tax and expenditure limitations at the state, and potentially local, <br /> levels of government that could only be ovei7-idden by a vote of the people—an example of these <br /> proposals is the "Taxpayers Bill of Rights"; <br /> WHEREAS, such proposals would tie the hands of state and local leaders in times of <br /> crisis and other unpredictable circumstances, putting state and local governments on "auto pilot" <br /> and circumventing thoughtful consideration of policy decisions; <br /> WHEREAS, such proposals would prevent state and local officials from making the <br /> • tough decisions they were elected to make, passing the responsibility for learning all aspects of <br /> often complex issues to citizens who have other jobs and responsibilities; <br /> WHEREAS, amending the constitution is a virtually irrevocable action and should only <br /> be undertaken when legislative remedies have proven inadequate; <br /> WHEREAS, such proposals are unnecessary—a"solution in search of a problem"— as <br /> demonstrated by lawmakers at both state and local levels of government taking action to deal <br /> with one of the worst budget crises to hit the State of Minnesota and, by result,Minnesota's <br /> cities; <br /> , WHEREAS, this is further demonstrated by the fact that state and local spending as a <br /> percentage of personal income has actually declined in recent years, even before the 2003 deficit; <br /> WHEREAS,regardless of whether TABOR/TELs are applied just to the State or to local <br /> governments as well, these proposals would bring great harm to local communities through <br /> continued reductions in state funding, increases in unfunded State mandates, and,potentially, <br /> direct tax and expenditure limitations at the local level, which would severely erode decision- <br /> making at the local level and the ability to provide the basic services residents and businesses <br /> expect and deserve; � <br /> WHEREAS, such proposals would force the State, and potentially cities,to spend <br /> � valuable time and money asking for permission from the same people who elected them before <br /> any action can be taken on important issues, and would also force taxpayers to pay twice for <br /> Page 1 of 2 . <br />