My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
06-16-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:18 AM
Creation date
6/17/2025 10:14:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet Planning Commission
Section
Planning Commission
Subject
Planning Commission Packet
Document Date
6/16/2025
Retention Effective Date
6/17/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
20 <br />or his/her designee” (California Air Resources Board 1998). Multifamily <br />residential buildings are required to provide two bicycle spaces per dwell- <br />ing unit. The city has an extensive network of bike routes and other bicycle <br />infrastructure. <br />Table 4 offers a small sample of bicycle parking requirements from com- <br />munities in different regions of the country. <br />Many of the ordinances include design and location standards for re- <br />quired bicycle parking that dictate, for example, bicycle rack styles, a mini- <br />mum distance from building walls, and visibility and accessibility of the <br />parking. <br />Transit Allowances <br />Offering off-street parking reductions based on proximity to public trans- <br />portation is an increasingly popular approach. These reductions may serve <br />to encourage transit ridership and, more generally, development in corri- <br />dors or nodes that are well served by bus or rail. (Reduced parking re- <br />quirements related to superior transit access are inherent in some of the <br />other code provisions discussed in this chapter, such as reduced parking <br />requirements in downtown areas.) <br />Minneapolis allows a 10 percent parking reduction for multifamily resi- <br />dential dwellings “if the proposed use is located within 300 feet of a transit <br />stop with midday service headways of 30 minutes or less in each direc- <br />tion.” For all other uses, “the minimum parking requirement may be re- <br />duced 10 percent if the use provides an adequate sheltered transit stop <br />within the development, as determined by the city engineer.” <br />Transit stops are one of the off-street parking reduction alternatives al- <br />lowed in the Pittsburgh zoning code: <br />Transit Stops <br />The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall be authorized, in accordance with <br />the Special Exception provisions of Sec. 922.07, to permit the incorpora- <br />tion of transit stops as a means of satisfying the otherwise applicable off- <br />street parking standards, provided the following conditions are met: <br />1. The transit stop shall be designed to be a station or waiting area for <br />transit riders, clearly identified as such, and open to the public at large; <br />2. The transit stop shall be designed as an integral part of the develop- <br />ment project, with direct access to the station or waiting area from the <br />development site; <br />3. The transit waiting area or platform shall be designed to accommodate <br />passengers in a covered waiting area, with seating for a minimum of 20 <br />persons, shall include internal lighting, and shall include other features <br />which encourage the use of the facility, such as temperature control <br />within the waiting area or the inclusion of food vendors; <br />4. The maximum reduction in the number of parking spaces shall be no <br />more than 20 percent of the total required spaces; <br />5. The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall request a report and recommen- <br />dation from the Planning Director on the planning aspects, and the po- <br />tential impacts of the proposed reduction in parking through the provi- <br />sion of a transit facility; <br />6. The transit stop shall be maintained by the developer for the life of the <br />development project. <br />Communities with Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordi- <br />nances often incorporate transit access in the ordinance as a way to justify <br />parking reductions and/or limit a development’s impact on the city and <br />137
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.