My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
06-16-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:18 AM
Creation date
6/17/2025 10:14:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet Planning Commission
Section
Planning Commission
Subject
Planning Commission Packet
Document Date
6/16/2025
Retention Effective Date
6/17/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
18 <br />The Richmond, Virginia, zoning code includes a very extensive descrip- <br />tion of the rationale underlying its Parking Overlay Districts: <br />Pursuant to the general purposes of this chapter, the intent of Parking <br />Overlay Districts is to provide a means whereby the City Council may <br />establish overlay districts to enable application of appropriate off-street <br />parking requirements to business uses located within areas of the City <br />characterized by a densely developed pedestrian shopping environment <br />in close proximity to residential neighborhoods. The districts are <br />intended to recognize that, due to several factors, business uses located <br />in such areas typically generate lower demands for privately maintained <br />off-street parking spaces than are reflected in the requirements gen- <br />erally applicable in the City and set forth in Section 32-710.1 of this <br />chapter. <br />Parking requirements within Parking Overlay Districts are designed to <br />reflect the factors that result in lower parking demand in such areas. These <br />include: a function similar to that of a shopping center, resulting in a high <br />proportion of multipurpose trips by patrons; considerable walk-in trade <br />due to proximity to residential areas and employment centers; significant <br />numbers of employees that walk to work due to proximity to living areas; <br />availability of public transportation; and many older buildings which have <br />been adapted from other uses and tend to be less efficient than newer spe- <br />cial purpose buildings. It is also intended that each Parking Overlay Dis- <br />trict reflect the supply of public parking spaces within the district by pro- <br />viding for further reduction in the parking requirements in direct <br />proportion to available public parking. <br />Parking Overlay Districts are intended to complement the UB Urban Busi- <br />ness District and to be applied principally to those areas within such dis- <br />trict which possess the factors enumerated above, but may also be applied <br />independent of the UB District to other areas where such factors exist within <br />other specified districts. <br />Bicycle Parking <br />A number of communities recognize how bicycle travel can reduce vehicular <br />parking demand. Overall, less than 1 percent of all trips in the U.S. are <br />bicycle trips. Since 48 percent of all trips in the U.S. are shorter than three <br />miles, many believe the potential for increasing utilitarian bicycle travel is <br />great (Pucher and Schimek 1999). The extent to which bicycle travel can <br />substitute for automobile travel may depend on demographics, climate, <br />and the availability of the infrastructure to accommodate bicycle use, in- <br />cluding bicycle parking. U.S. communities that have the highest level of <br />bicycle use tend to be midsize cities with a large student population, such <br />as Gainesville, Florida; Madison, Wisconsin; Boulder, Colorado; and Davis, <br />California. The presence of a major university need not be a prerequisite to <br />making a serious effort to encourage bicycle travel as a legitimate form of <br />daily transportation. <br />PAS Report 459, Bicycle Facility Planning (Pinsoff and Musser 1995), cov- <br />ered a wide range of bicycle infrastructure and regulation issues. The re- <br />port included the following general guide that suggested minimum bi- <br />cycle requirements for a variety of uses. <br />A number of communities have chosen to institute minimum bicycle <br />parking requirements, while some also allow for a reduction in the num- <br />ber of required automobile spaces when bicycle parking is provided. (See <br />Table 3.) <br />In Davis, California, considered by many to be the preeminent bicycling <br />community in the U.S., “the number and location of all bicycle parking <br />spaces shall be in accordance with the community development director <br />135
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.