Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br />ments (e.g., shared parking determinations, discussed in detail below). <br />If the resources to implement the process are not available, review the <br />process and simplify it to match the resources. Without effective admin- <br />istration and enforcement, regulations can be a political lightning rod <br />and generate litigation. <br />Reuse of Buildings <br />Many codes recognize that requiring different levels of off-street parking <br />for a variety of commercial uses may lead to problems when new uses <br />attempt to move into buildings that were tailored to different commercial <br />uses. For example, a 5,000-square-foot retail building may be constructed <br />to the requirement of one space per 400 square feet of gross floor area, <br />requiring 13 spaces. If a subsequent tenant would like to convert the build- <br />ing to an office use, a parking standard of one space per 300 square feet <br />would result in a requirement of 17 spaces, thus not allowing for office use <br />without securing additional parking or granting a variance. Portland, Or- <br />egon, specifically refers to this issue in its code, as follows: <br />Minimum Required Parking Spaces: <br />A. Purpose <br />The purpose of required parking spaces is to provide enough on-site <br />parking to accommodate the majority of traffic generated by the range <br />of uses which might locate at the site over time. Transit-supportive pla- <br />zas and bicycle parking may be substituted for some required parking <br />on a site to encourage transit use and bicycling by employees and visi- <br />tors to the site. The required parking numbers correspond to broad use <br />categories, not specific uses, in response to this long-term emphasis. <br />There may be an inherent tension or contradiction between the desire to <br />have off-street parking requirements that closely approximate the parking <br />demand for each individual land use and the desire to ensure that build- <br />ings may be easily adapted to house a variety of different uses. <br />ZONING CODE PROVISIONS THAT RESPOND TO AND/OR INFLUENCE <br />PARKING DEMAND <br />What follows is an overview of a range of strategies communities have <br />adopted that go beyond standard minimum parking requirements. Many <br />of these strategies recognize and respond to unique factors associated with <br />different parts of the community in question (e.g., commercial strips, down- <br />town districts). <br />Mixed-Use Development and Shared Parking <br />The overall number of parking spaces serving multiple uses in close prox- <br />imity to one another may be significantly reduced through shared parking <br />arrangements. Sharing parking allows more efficient use of land compared <br />to providing dedicated parking spaces for each use. Carefully crafted shared <br />parking arrangements between two or more uses can reasonably meet peak <br />demand, particularly in mixed-use areas or on mixed-use or multiple-use <br />sites. The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2002) notes that shared park- <br />ing is also most appropriate where: <br />• a specific parking problem exists; <br />• land values and parking facility costs are high; <br />• clustered development is desired; <br />• traffic congestion or vehicle pollution are significant problems; and <br />• adding pavement is undesirable. <br />126