My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5117
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 5100 - 5199 January 12, 2004 - June 14, 2004)
>
Resolution 5117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2015 11:07:06 AM
Creation date
11/10/2015 11:07:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�. ; <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> • �� 3 C ITY of ORONU <br /> ,� -: , �, <br /> a ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��`�kEsll�g'�G NO. e� � �. `� <br /> of house and driveway which allows for an unusually substantial area of lawn in the <br /> runoff flow path for infiltration. In order to avoid filling in the 0-75'zone to <br /> accommodate the driveway, the applicant was approved for a retaining wall <br /> adjacent to the driveway. <br /> b) Now that the house is completed and final grades established, applicant has � <br /> concerns about the necessary height of the retaining wall. Safety is the primary <br /> factor which supports eliminating the wall.The wall as approved was at the edge <br /> of the driveway,with an immediate drop of 2.5',then a l:l downslope for another <br /> � 3-4',with gradual slope after that. The driveway functionally is about 6'above <br /> original�ade at this point, and filling/grading would have stopped at the 75' <br /> setback line.This irnmediate grade change in an area that will have pedestrian <br /> traffic, children playing, etc. is less than ideal. <br /> c) The visual impacts of the wall would be primarily as it is viewed from the lagaon. <br /> � Grading the slope and vegetating it will provide a softer and more natural view <br /> from the lagoon than a 64'long;2'-6"high wall.The driveway itself will be only � <br /> rninimally visible from the lagoon regardless of whether the wall is built. <br /> d) Creating a 3:1 slope from the driveway(elev.942')to the existing grade(934�will <br /> eliminate 64'of retaining wall,or approximately 50-60 s.f.of hardcover,which will <br /> allow for a better situation in teims of runoff. The trade-off is that rainfall that <br /> would have fallen on a relatively flat lawn surFace at the base of the wall,will now <br /> fall on a slope and be somewhat more prone to run off than soak in during certain <br /> storm events. To mitigate any negative runoff impacts that might be createdby the <br /> increased slope in the 0-75'zone,a 5-10'wide vegetated border/buffer shouldbe <br /> established at the base of the slope. This area shouid be maintained in high grasses <br /> or other vegetation which will allow for greater infiltration in this area. <br /> e) Because City code requires finish grades to be 3:1 or flatter,the 8' total drop <br /> translates to a 24'wide slope about 80'in length.Total fill needed for the project <br /> is approximately 250 cubic yards. <br /> � � � Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.