Laserfiche WebLink
Du WAYNE L. SCHIBILLA <br />CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT <br />SUITE 314. SONS OF NORWAY BUILDING <br />1455 WEST LAKE STREET <br />MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55408 <br />TELLPNONE (612) 827.5891 <br />'ay 8, 1980 <br />?r. Thomas Jacobs, Buildin- Inspector <br />Village of Orono <br />1335 Brun Road South <br />Crystal Bay, ;•:innesota 55323 <br />Dear 1. <br />',r. Jacot s: <br />I am writing this letter as you surrested to document our <br />conversation of last weed: and my concerns over the current con- <br />struction ta):i n _mace at '1215 Crystal Bay Road ( the Haverberg <br />property). <br />As I indicated to you I own the property at 3235 Crystal <br />Bay Road which shares a cor-mon property line with the 1tHaverberg <br />property". <br />A screen porch has been constructed over an existing slab <br />within the last year, which I do not have any problems with. My <br />concerns lie in the fact that I would not like any further improve- <br />ments made upon the screen porch (i.e. a three -seasons porch or <br />permanent living space) for a number of reasons some of which are <br />as follows: <br />The existing screen porch is no more than <br />3-4 feet from our common property line - <br />at a maximum. I am not sure this is in com- <br />pliance with current building ordiances. I <br />am sure it would restrict anything I might <br />do to improve my own property. <br />The position of the screen porch is set <br />ahead of my house. As I indicated to you this <br />is no problem at this point in time since the <br />screen porch F-?ves the illusion of not being <br />there (i.e. you can see through it). I would <br />not appreciate the porch being developed <br />further, as mentioned above, since it would <br />then restrict the view from my property. <br />The drainage off the porch roof must effect <br />my property simply because it is so close to <br />the lot line. <br />