Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA25-000019 <br />May 19, 2025 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION <br />1. Although they both reflect principles of an RPUD, neither Northgate Two nor Hill O’ Way <br />Manor was created as an RPUD. Does the Commission find that the property’s proximity and <br />proposed design meet the exception criteria for RPUD applicability? <br />2. Does the Commission find it appropriate to amend the density guidance for this 1.0-acre <br />property? <br />3. The RPUD process is available to meet certain city goals for density, housing diversity, energy <br />conservation, preservation of natural features, etc.. Does the applicant’s plan, including the <br />proposed density, meet those goals? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> <br />PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS <br />The proposed density is below the guidance for the property. A comprehensive plan amendment to reduce <br />the density of a one-acre property would be inconsistent with the city’s goals. The property can be <br />redeveloped under the existing conditions as a single lot with one home, or consider a third lot (3 <br />units/acre) following the layout of Northgate Two. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Planning Commission should address the issues for discussion and provide direction and guidance to the <br />applicant on the proposed Concept Plan. <br />32