My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5293
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 5200 - 5299 (June 28, 2004 - April 11, 2005)
>
Resolution 5293
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:22 PM
Creation date
11/9/2015 3:38:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' . <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> � �� CITY of ORONO <br /> � -.. � � <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��l ��'~ � � � � <br /> `�kESH.O� NO. <br /> a. No increase in hardcover in either the 0-75' or 75'-250' zone results <br /> with the proposed improvements. <br /> b. A net reduction of 502 s.f. in the 0-75' zone results with the revised <br /> proposal. <br /> c. A net reduction of 286 s.f. in the 75'-250' zone results with the revised <br /> proposal. <br /> d. The most lakeward wall, setback 68' when 75' is required, is being <br /> rebuilt due to rot and will be located in the same location thus not <br /> encroaching any further on the required 75' setback. <br /> e. The property is situated on a point where almost the entire lot is <br /> lakeward of the defined average lakeshore setback line but where the <br /> orientation of the existing residences arrd proposed addition will have <br /> no new impacts on lake views enjoyed by neighboring property <br /> owners. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br /> property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br /> Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.