Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
• � ,•. � . <br /> • � . <br /> , � - . �j Oa�. ' <br /> r `�� <br /> � 0 �, O ` <br /> C ITY of ORONO <br /> � -� ; � � � �. <br /> , ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCt�L <br /> ���k'ESH.�4�G NO. � � 6 � � . <br /> � <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B, One Family Lakeshore Residential <br /> Zoning District which requires a minimum lot area of one acre and a <br /> . minimum lot width of 140'. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br /> � held on November 15, 2004 and recommended approval of variances <br /> based on the following findings: <br /> a. The property contains 15,679 s.f. or 0.36 acre in area and has 95' in <br /> widtli. <br /> b. The property was granted variances in 2001 for structural coverage <br /> • and hardcover by Resolution No. 4644. <br /> c. The proposed rebuild and reconfiguration of the lake side deck will not <br /> � result in a net increase in structural coverage or hardcover within the <br /> 0-75' or 75'-250' setback,zones from those levels approved in 2001. <br /> d. The 2001 structure and hardcover removals resulted in an orientation <br /> of the deck which did not allow for safe staging in the pool area. � <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recorrimendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> ; comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. , <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are � <br /> � peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br /> property; would not merely serve as a conYenience to the applicants,but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br /> • � Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />