Laserfiche WebLink
�OtVO CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 1� ���' NO. 7587 <br /> tAkESHov� <br /> a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable <br /> manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The <br /> variance request is residential in nature and is reasonable considering the unique <br /> nature of the Property having a large wetland at the rear, which pushes the <br /> development closer to the lake. <br /> b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not <br /> created by the landowner. The location of the existing home was not created by <br /> the owners; and <br /> c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." The <br /> location of the addition will not be lakeward of the home and will not alter the <br /> character of the neighborhood. The majority of the neighboring homes are <br /> situated within the 75-foot setback area. <br /> B4."Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic <br /> considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br /> B5."Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br /> for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as <br /> defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br /> 78." This condition is not applicable. <br /> B6."The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br /> Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br /> located." This condition is not applicable as residential improvements are permitted in the <br /> LR-1A residential zoning district. <br /> B7."The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br /> as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. <br /> B8."The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br /> property or immediately adjoining property." The existing home's location and orientation <br /> on the Property are unique circumstances. Due to the location and size of the wetlands <br /> impacting the properties along this portion of North Shore Drive, the developed homes <br /> are nearer to the lake than the 75-foot setback. The application of the 75-foot setback <br /> requirement causes a practical difficulty. The home and the proposed addition will not <br /> encroach on the average lakeshore setback. <br /> B9."The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the <br /> land is located." The location of the home, within the 75-foot setback, is relatively unique <br /> 4 <br />