My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5253
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 5200 - 5299 (June 28, 2004 - April 11, 2005)
>
Resolution 5253
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:22 PM
Creation date
11/9/2015 2:29:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. � � ��� <br /> 0 0 <br /> � C ITY of ORON4 <br /> � �� �ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��`�kESI3�4�G NO. e1r'1 � � � <br /> required, and hardcover variance to permit 37% hardcover within the 250'-500' zone <br /> when 30% is nonnally allowed. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br /> Orono, Miiniesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This renewal application was revi.ewed as Zoning File #04-3047. The <br /> original application was reviewed as Zoning File#03-2936. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR — 1 C zoning district, which requires a <br /> minimuin lot area of one half ('/2) acre and a minimum lot width of 100 <br /> feet. The applicants' property is 0.49 acres and has a width of 60 feet. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br /> held on September 20, 2004 and recommended approval of the renewal <br /> variances for lot area, lot width and 250'-500' zone hardcover variance <br /> based on the following findings: <br /> a. The property is 0.49 acres in size when .50 acres is required. <br /> b. The property has a lot width of 60 feet at the shoreline and 75' setback <br /> when 100' is required. <br /> � c. Because the lot is being reviewed as a rebuild, the lot inust conform to <br /> current Zoning Ordinance standards or a hardship shall be presented. <br /> d. Due to the configuration of the lot, minimal area exists in the 250'- <br /> 500' zone, hence a variance to allow excess hardcover for the <br /> proposed detached garage is not reasonable. <br /> e. Because of sight visibility problems on Casco Circle, a turnaround is <br /> necessary to safely exit the drive. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> renewal variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.