My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5241
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 5200 - 5299 (June 28, 2004 - April 11, 2005)
>
Resolution 5241
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 2:24:58 PM
Creation date
11/9/2015 2:24:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br /> �`� • <br /> � O� ' <br /> O O <br /> • �� � CITY of ORONO <br /> a � <br /> ; ti <br /> �� G�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> L�kESS�g'� NO. � � � Il . <br /> A RESOLUTION TO AMEND <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 4915 <br /> REGARDING LOT 6, BLOCK 1,STONEBAY <br /> -FILE#2840 <br /> . WHEREAS,the City of Orono is ainunicipal corporation orgauized and existulg under <br /> the laws of the State of Minnesota; and <br /> WHEREAS,the City Couilcil of the City of Orono(hereinafter"Clty COL111C11")has <br /> adopted la�zd development regulations for the orderly,economic and safe developnient of landwitlun tlle <br /> City; aud <br /> WHEREAS,the Cityhas approved certain Conditioiis for development withul the Planned <br /> • UiutDevelopment plat of STONEBAY,Heiinepnz County,Minnesota,via City Council Resohition No. <br /> 4915; and <br /> WHEREAS, Coizdition 2(j) of Resolution No. 4915 grants a variance for rambler <br /> townlioine Lot 27(platted as Lot 6,Block 1,STONEBA�to be located 20'from the northplat boundary <br /> instead of tlle 35'building setback nonnally required; and <br /> WHEREAS, Dahlstrom Developinent LLC (the applicant) has requested a minor <br /> amendment to the PUD approvals granted in Resolution No.4915 to allow PUD flexibility for cei-tain <br /> proposed eneroaclunents of the 20' setback required in the aforesaid Condition 2(j), as follows: <br /> 1. Developer requests PUD flexibility to allow the north wall ofthe townhome building on said Lot <br /> 6 to be 19.6 feet instead of 20 feet from the north boundary. <br /> 2. Developer requests PUD flexibility to allow the proposed 2-foot roof overhang to be 17.6 feet <br /> from the north lot line rather than the 18.5 foot setback that wouldnormallybe allowedwith a 1.5' <br /> non-encroachment overhang. . <br /> , 3. DeveloperrequestsPUDflexibilitytoallowfortheproposeddiningroombump-outtobel8.lfeet <br /> from the north lot line; and <br /> • Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.