My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
07-10-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2025 4:35:35 PM
Creation date
5/6/2025 4:30:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
569
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/•o <br />To: <br />Frcn: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />July 5, 1989 <br />#1419 J. K. Bowers, 2905 Casco Point Road - <br />Variance - Resolution <br />Zoning District - LR-IC, 1/2 acre, sewered <br />COMICIl tIEEnNS <br />JilL 101989 <br />0CtTYOF <br />Application - Request for average lakeshore setback, side <br />setback, and hardcover variances to construct addition and <br />decks to existing residence. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Planning Commission Action Notice of 6/22/89 <br />Exhibit B - Proposed Resolution <br />Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibits of 6/15/89 <br />Discussion - <br />Please review the memo and exhibits of June 15, 1989. <br />Applicant is requesting to construct a 2-story addition to the <br />lakeshore side of his existing residence. Although the addition <br />—^will be 130*+ from the lakeshore, the neighboring residences are <br />,/*^\both set back from the lake such that a variance to average <br />>v^setback is required. The neighbor to the south who would be <br />affected by the average setback encroachment appeared at the <br />Planning Commission and expressed concern about the side setback <br />of the proposed deck being slightly less than 10*, but did not <br />state that he had a problem with the average setback <br />encroachment. <br />On the opposite side lot line, the existing house is <br />approximately 8.9* from the side lot line where a 10* side <br />setback is normally required, and the proposed addition will <br />continue the slightly substandard setback on that side. The <br />neighbor affected by that side setback has not commented. <br />Existing hardcover on the property is 32.4%. Planning <br />Commission reviewed the site plan and recommended approval of <br />hardcover variances as long no increase in hardcover occurs above <br />the existing 32.4%. This can be accomplished by removal of the <br />existing brick fireplace, a portion of unused driveway <br />b lac*; .’Opping near the garage entry, and removal of a flat stone <br />walkway and patio area on the west side of the house. The <br />driveway could also be narrowed somewhat in order to accomplish <br />the hardcover tradeoffs. <br />I ; <br />o
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.