Laserfiche WebLink
HINDTBS OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEBTING OP JUNK 2€« Iftt <br />ZONING PILE #1410~PRINEAS CONTINUED <br />Ms. Laquay explained that the reason Mr. and Mrs. Prlnaas <br />did not wish to execute the agreement was because they did not <br />feel that the revised driveway location would be fair to the <br />Nelsons. They wanted to get approval from the Nelsons before <br />they signed the agreement. They tried to contact the Nelsons^ <br />but could not reach them because they were out of town on <br />vacation. <br />Mr. Nelson felt that it was inappropriate to place any <br />restrictions on the future owners of the Prineas* property. He <br />felt t^>at should it be necessary to place any restrictions <br />regard! the location of the driveway that it would be better to <br />have it located in the center of the property. <br />Mayor Grabek said that he felt inclined to table this <br />matter. Ms. Laquay indicated that the Prineases would prefer to <br />have the matter resolved without further delay. She said that <br />there were no specific code requirements by the City pertaining <br />to the location of the driveway and that if they so chose, there <br />should be no reason why the driveway could not abut the Stierna's <br />property they way the Stierna driveway abutted their property. <br />Ms. Laquay said that the applicants were only trying to make both <br />adjacent property owners happy. <br />It was moved by CounciImember Callahan, seconded by <br />CounciImember Goetten, to approve the lot width variance. <br />CounciImember Nettles moved to amend CounciImember Callahan’s <br />motion to include a specific driveway location as a condition of <br />variance approval. CounciImember Callahan did not wish to amend <br />his original motion and CounciImember Goetten indicated that she <br />would not second CounciImember Nettles amendment. Motion, <br />Ayes*5, Nays**0, Motirn passed. <br />#1423 EDWARD BROWN <br />355 STUBBS BAY ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2651 <br />Mr. and Mrs. Brown were present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council and <br />Mayor Grabek that the Browns were seeking approval of a variance <br />to allow an accessory building to be located nearer the front lot <br />line than the principal building. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />CounciImember Goetten, to approve the variance to allow an <br />accessory structure to be located near the lot line than the <br />principal structure. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays^-0, Motion passed.