My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5222
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 5200 - 5299 (June 28, 2004 - April 11, 2005)
>
Resolution 5222
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2020 1:49:54 PM
Creation date
11/9/2015 2:17:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O <br /> _. O O <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF Ty CITY COUNCIL`9kE II�g�G NO. 5 9 <br /> S <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-lA, One Family Lakeshore Zoning <br /> District which requires a minimum lot area of 2 Acres and a minimum lot <br /> width of 200'. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br /> held on August 16, 2004 and recommended approval of the variances <br /> based on the following findings: <br /> a. The property has 4,180 s.f. (0.096 Acre) in area and 44' in width. <br /> b. No additional land is available for acquisition by the applicant to make <br /> the property conforming in area or width. <br /> c. The property is served with municipal sewer. A single family <br /> residence has existed on the property for many years. <br /> d. 79% of the applicant's property is located within 75' of the creek and <br /> the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. <br /> e. Because the property is less than 10,000 s.f. in area it is allowed a <br /> 1,500 s.f. structural footprint absent other factors. Construction of a <br /> 864 s.f. home accounts for 21.8% of hardcover within the 0-75' <br /> setback zone and 16% of hardcover within the 75'-250' setback zone. <br /> f. The applicant has proposed minimal driveway, and walk (and has <br /> forgone a deck) in order to limit the magnitude of the hardcover <br /> excesses. <br /> g. The size of the proposed residence and magnitude of hardcover <br /> variance is consistent with other approved development in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.