Laserfiche WebLink
Slocu« Aovedf Cochran seconded that the Financial Condition report <br />approved as subaitted« Motion carried unani <nousl y. <br />4/30/1* <br />Bjorlin eovedi Slocue seconded that the payeent oF bille ia III# w <br />aeount oF 132,222.23, check nuaberi 5457 through 5494, be approved •• •laiaittaifii <br />2) Audit of Vouchers for Payeent <br />Notion carried unaniaously. <br />C.Sii.ndi.ng. CaeiillEfi <br />nWATEA STRUCTURES . Chair Cochran <br />mm <br />dock <br />Ltkti <br />a) r .netonka Boat Morkf fOrono) density and new <br />increase 6 BSU on BroNns Bay and 42 BSU on Tanager <br />recoaaendation for approval based on aeenities as lubaitted. <br />blHinnetonka Boat Works (Nayzata)variance, density, and <br />nen dock license to add 12 peraanent BSU; coaaittee recoeaendatiofi <br />for approval based on aaenities as subaittcd. <br />mmrn <br />. .V, . ■■ <br />Cochran reported the Minnetonka Boat Works have asked that boil <br />be aoved forward to the June eeeting. <br />Cochran, aoved, Foster seconded that the Minnetonka Boats Works agenda itaaa <br />advanced to the June 29 Board meeting. Motion carried unaniaoualy. <br />St. Alh'i <br />License <br />i Bay Marina Special Density Perait and Naw Dack <br />Applicant requests further consideration at the June Board aaeting to praaant <br />additional facts for clarification of their application. <br />The aotion to approve the Special Density Perait and New Dock License failed to <br />pass at the 4/26 Board eeeting. LeFevere subeitted a Mceorandue on the appli* <br />cation providing background, effect on fishing and public access to the lake, <br />lopact of the proposed facilities on nearby land uses, iepact of the proposed <br />facility on recreational use of the lake, nature of the proposed facility, and <br />evaluation of aaenities agreed to by the applicant. This was done in advance of <br />the Findings and Qrder due to the prospect of litigation the applicant has <br />s iggested eay be necessary in their case as a result of the non>approval. <br />LeFtvert then reviewed Robert s Rules of Order on voting requireeents necessary <br />to rescind the Board action in response to Foster's question on the itee. A <br />aajority vote of the entire Board is required (eight votes) to rescind the <br />action without an advance notice. A aajority of Board acabers present are <br />required if there is notice of intent given in advance of the aeeting that such a <br />aotion would be aade. <br />Foster signified his intent to sake a aotion at the June 28 Board aeeting to <br />rescind the Board's previous action on the St. Alban s Bay Hanna application.