Laserfiche WebLink
long predicted recession sometime in 1990. Some maintain we are <br />currently going through a rolling recession or depression as <br />there are sectors of the economy which are hit for various <br />reasons such as the energy downturn for the last four or five <br />years following downturns in the "rust ’ elt". <br />As is true with the national economy, the Minnesota economy <br />particularly in the Metro area has continued to expand. The <br />problem however, has been a growing sentiment for taxpayer revolt <br />particular!ly regarding property taxes. The Minnesota Miracle <br />which was initiated in the early *70*s, has now become a victim <br />of its own success. The Legislature continues to use bandaids <br />attempting to solve the expenditure driven formulas, particularly <br />in trying to keep taxes down in the Out State area. This <br />complicated system however, has become unpredictable. Property <br />tax reform that was passed in 1988 for 1989 resulted in tax <br />increases, not cnly in the Metro suburban area, but in the areas <br />Out St • that are substantially more than Legislators had <br />anticip. This c.,'used the 1989 Legislature to moderate these <br />increases by additional State monies being poured into property <br />tax relief together with making the levy limits and expenditures <br />as tight as possible for local units of government. This attempt <br />was hoped to have property taxes at a palatable level for 1990 in <br />advance of the 1990 elections. It was anticipated that the 1990 <br />Legislature will work to get money into programs that they have <br />held back on in *89 in hopes of making a positive impressici on <br />property taxpayers together with constituent support groups that <br />have not received much during 1989. With the Governor's veto <br />and possible special session which may undertake a substantial <br />change in direction for 1990, this may be significantly altered. <br />Regardless of a sepcial session a significant recession in the <br />latter part of *89 into the early part of *90 may cause <br />rubstantial problems in funding these relief and expenditure <br />measures. <br />For Orono the tight levy limit is exacerbated by the need for <br />selected expenditure increases during 1990. This will result in <br />a rather tight budget year in 1990. A recession may materialize <br />because of higher interest rates, at least in the housing sector. <br />This could cause a downturn in construction activity as could a <br />general recession. Price Increases in current items primarily in <br />the energy sector will translate into unit costs for these <br />products that are higher than the rate of inflation. <br />GOALS - Primary budgetary goals for 1990 include: <br />- Continued utilization of a capital budget framework <br />which may include the following projects for 1990: <br />Old Crystal Bay/Bridge Replacement <br />North Ferndale/MSA <br />Willow Drive/Seal Coating <br />Projects in either 1989 or 1990