My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
04-21-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:18 AM
Creation date
4/22/2025 12:46:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet Planning Commission
Section
Planning Commission
Subject
Packet
Document Date
4/21/2025
Retention Effective Date
4/23/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
maximum allowable height we could create a structure that meets both the minimum floor <br />elevation as well as stays within the City’s volume of the existing structure. <br />However, the MCWD has a requirement that all openings be at least two feet above the <br />100-year flood elevation – functionally one foot higher than the City’s code requires. In the <br />case of MCWD, the relevant section is their Floodplain Alteration Rule. Under Section 2 – <br />Applicability the rule states that, “…a structure intended for residential, commercial, <br />industrial, or institutional occupancy must be constructed so that door and window <br />openings are at least two feet above the 100-year high water elevation of the waterbody.” <br />Our request for this variance is directly related to this one foot diƯerence in height between <br />the City Code and the MCWD rule. <br />The sloped roof of the current boathouse has a lowest height above existing grade of 9’-2” <br />and is 10’-5” above existing grade at its highest. In granting the variance, the height of the <br />new structure above the new grade will be about 8’-6”. In actuality, the distance from the <br />grade to the top of the roof will be shorter than the existing boathouse yielding less of a <br />visual impact and, relative to the existing boathouse, will appear shorter. Further, the <br />highest point on the existing boathouse is 942.19’ ASL. Whereas the proposed maximum <br />height of the new boathouse will be 942.03’ ASL. Thus, the actual overall height of the <br />proposed structure will be approximately 2” lower in real terms than the existing highest <br />point even with the granting of one additional foot of overall height. <br />To summarize the discussion above, we have provided a table showing how the proposed <br />boathouse with the variance granted compares with the existing. As the data shows, the <br />proposed boathouse will be smaller overall (as indicated in green) in both real and relative <br />terms, smaller in footprint, and smaller in volume. The only aspect that will increase <br />(shown in red) is the height of the lowest portion of the roof. This is our request, and as <br />discussed previously, this 1’-0” increase in grade is necessary to comply with the MCWD’s <br />opening elevation requirements and provides greater flood protection. <br />Feature Existing Proposed Delta <br />Lowest Roof Height Above Grade (ft) 9'-2" 8'-8 1/4" -5 3/4" <br />Highest Roof Height Above Grade (ft) 10'-7" 8'-11 1/2" -1'-7 12" <br />Lowest Roof Height (ASL) 940.78 941.77 0.99’ <br />Highest Roof Height (ASL) 942.19 942.03 -0.16’ <br />Footprint (sf) 859 780 -79sf <br />Enclosed Footprint (sf) 472 415 -57sf <br />Roof area (sf, plan view) 1023 791 -232sf <br />Volume (cf) 8616 6828 -1788ft3 <br /> <br />89
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.