Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #LA25-000012 <br />21 April 2025 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The variance <br />supports the minimal expansion of the non-conforming boathouse within the lake yard and <br />average lakeshore setback. Lake yard construction prohibitions are intended to maintain the <br />natural lakeshore and encourage development away from the lake. Alternatively, the goals of <br />average lakeshore setback include protecting views from land into the lake, and the requested <br />variances to increase the height of the existing boathouse to the minimum amount necessary to <br />meet the floodplain regulations are in harmony with the Ordinance. The most adjacent neighbors <br />are situated so that the changes to the existing boathouse will not impact their lake views. The <br />minimal additional mass of the flat roof areas within the setbacks will not be closer to the lake <br />than existing and will not negatively impact the views into the property from the lake. This <br />criterion is met. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in reconstruction of <br />the existing boathouse (without footprint expansions) within the setbacks in a residential zone are <br />consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance to permit the minimal upward volume <br />expansion is solely to conform to the floodplain regulations. This criterion is met. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by <br />the official controls; The variances requested to permit reconstruction of the boathouse <br />with minor upward expansion appear to be reasonable; the flat roof design of the <br />boathouse minimizes any potential negative impacts; the mature vegetation, and location <br />of neighboring homes separate the boathouse from the adjacent neighbors. Additionally, <br />the variance relating to the exception for the floodplain rescue bench on the lake side of <br />the boathouse is reasonable, as it is not a principal building. This criterion is met. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The <br />boathouse was originally constructed in the 1960s by previous owners and needs <br />replacement due to its age and deferred maintenance; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The requested variances <br />will not result in the property being out of character with the neighborhood, will not <br />expand the footprint of the building, or result in additional encroachment into the setbacks <br />toward the lake. The new upward encroachment will not alter the character of the locality. <br />This criterion is met. <br />Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as <br />follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have <br />not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar <br />energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. <br />§ 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not <br />applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City <br />Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This c ondition <br />is not applicable, as residential improvements are allowed in the Lr-1B District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- <br />family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or <br />immediately adjoining property. The proximity of the boathouse within the setbacks is an existing <br />condition that is unique to the property. <br />85