My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
04-21-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:18 AM
Creation date
4/22/2025 12:46:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet Planning Commission
Section
Planning Commission
Subject
Packet
Document Date
4/21/2025
Retention Effective Date
4/23/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE #LA25-000011 <br />21 April 2025 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />75-foot Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1680) <br />As a portion of the existing deck was located within the 75-foot lakeshore setback, the proposed <br />modifications involve shifting the deck to the east, impacting the setback less. Approximately 47 <br />square feet of the existing deck hardcover will be removed; only 11 square feet of hardcover will be <br />added in the reconfiguration. Overall, the hardcover within the lakeshore setback will be reduced <br />from 1,203 square feet to 1,050 square feet. The extension of the roof eaves does not count towards <br />the hardcover calculations for the property <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br />traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of <br />property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for <br />variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement <br />would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under <br />consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be <br />in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not <br />constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate <br />access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered <br />construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The <br />board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for <br />property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as <br />a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br /> <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance: <br />The average lakeshore setback makes the development and improvement of this property and <br />existing house challenging. As a peninsular property, the proposed improvements are mostly <br />screened by the existing house and outside of the neighbors’ lake views, and efforts have been <br />made to reduce impacts to the lakeyard. This criterion is met. <br /> <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan: <br />The proposed variance to rebuild a deck, improve the roof and add patio space as accessory uses <br />to a single-family residence is permitted within LR-1B zoning and is consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan. This criterion is met. <br /> <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls: <br />The request to improve the existing house as proposed, opposed to rebuilding entirely, is <br />reasonable and meets all other applicable zoning regulations. This criterion is met. <br /> <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner: <br />The existing house is located within the average lakeshore setback and any improvements <br />to the house would fall within the lake views of the adjacent neighbors. This criterion is <br />met. <br /> <br /> <br />40
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.