Resolution 806 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 H. The storage units would result in an increased den- sity on a bay on Lake Minnetonka that is already congested and the LMCD has listed that they as a critical bay pursuant to its lake study. I. This sort of expansion would result in an unrea- sonable use of the riparian rights of the premises and would result in an excessive and illegal interference with the ripar- ian rights of others on Lake Minnetonka and specifically that bay. The council has already restricted other development on the bay because of congestion. J. The storage units are unacceptable in a residential or commercial zone and are not permitted by the Zoning Code in each zone. K. There is no adequate screening for the proposed storage units. L. The premises have only 290 feet of lake shore and the use of these storage units would allow Hork to place an abnormal number of boats into the lake from one small lot and would result in an abuse of his riparian rights. • J. The curb cut from the premises on County Road 15 is located on a curve and a hill and any use of that curb exposes the user and others on the road to a traffic hazard. The use of these storage units would result in additional traffic on an already hazardous road and additional traffic on a hazardous curb cut. 25. At a meeting on June 30, 1977, Hork and the City Council conceptually agreed to resolve the issues raised at Hork's request by a mutual agreement to experiment with the use of dry stack storage units on a temporary license basis to determine if the concerns as set forth in this resolution could be alleviated. 26. Hork at the council meeting of July 11, 1977, refused to be bound by the terms of the mutual agreement previously accepted by Hork. 27. The refusal to approve the request for dry stack storage units is unrelated to Hork's pending civil lawsuit against the City of Orono to obtain a Court review of the City's prior action in rezoning the premises. -a