My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
06-12-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2025 12:56:58 PM
Creation date
4/21/2025 12:51:29 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
503
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
mHOTES OP THB PIAKimiG COMMISSIOH MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 <br />^niiTHG FILE #1326-WAyZATA COOHTRY CLUB CONTINUED <br />His only responsibility is not to exaggerate the <br />existing condition. <br />There were no i. -her comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />re^ir«ents"'pr\^^^^^^ requested* bj^'the “AVnninrCommission are <br />met? Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />#1366 T-nenw BOTTBRPIELD <br />3925 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />preliminary subdivision <br />reconsideration of conditions of T-la^ t-iarMr. Butterfield was present for this matter. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron reminded <br />the Planninrcommission that they had <br />Butterfield's application for subdivision. Since that time, Mr. <br />h, working wltk ' «“",”t«rio”twith the easements for wetlands and setbacks. Mr. Buttertieia <br />was requesting clarifies' ion on the scions <br />recommendation that no structures be allowed <br />LinI? Af :er the Planning Commission review. f <br />verification from the DNR that the easement t° «°|S the Lu <br />Line was a public easement and not for Mr. Butterrieia on±y <br />jiris ssr.trnV.To\i:r«."“o s: <br />L^"".‘o”\n-rniKtr;o <br />th^ it does not extend to Lot 2. Kelley observed that in the <br />Mr Butterfield sold Lot 2r there would be no way to access <br />it. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that an j <br />have to be granted from Lot 1 or Outlet B to a®®*®® 2* <br />Lllows statid that she was opposed to 9 <br />of the Luce Line, even though that is currently being done. <br />Mr Butterfield stated that he did not understand why, if he <br />had 5 ^cres of land, hrcould not have an accessory structure. <br />Allows clarified that the Planning ‘^°”“i-,®®^^°“^uce Line^ <br />for\‘‘he Sr <br />retirements that he had to meet to retain his agriculture <br />status. <br />Planning Commissioner Johnson recollected ** <br />concerned aboGt the possibility of a ^®®i'^®"®® '■ <br />2 south of the Luce Line. However, he concurreo tr. <br />Ltterfield, in that it seemed ridiculous to disallow ... r. any <br />accessory structures south of the Luce Line.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.