Laserfiche WebLink
KEHOTBS OF THB PLANNING COMMISSIOH MEETING MAY 15, 1*^89 <br />ZONING FILE #1407-HAOSER CONTINUED <br />there being at least 2 acres of dry-buildable land for Lot 2. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen asked for clarification <br />regarding the 25* outlet dedication. Kelley explained that the <br />entire lot is being subdivided and the 25’ would allow for <br />future upgrading of the private road. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of the <br />proposed subdivision subject to the following conditions: <br />1. Driveway access t ' North Ferndale Hoad be by way of a <br />shared driveway and/or access off of a proposed outlot. <br />2. A retention basin be constructed in accordance with the <br />City Engineer's recommendations. <br />3. That 33* of right-of-way for North Ferndale Road be <br />dedicated as public roadway and that a 25* road outlot along the <br />north boundary be shown on the plat map for private road <br />purposes. <br />4. Lot 2 shall be subject to the standard park fee of <br />$200.00. <br />5. The applicant shall provide a site grading plan for the <br />proposed house on Lot 2 prior to issuance of the building permit. <br />6. Standard drainage and utility easements shalJ be shown <br />on the plat map. <br />Kelley questioned whether the standard draina *nd utility <br />easement would include the retention pond? Gaf ..n suggested <br />making that an additional condition. Hanson amended his motion <br />to include the requirement that a flowage anr. conservation <br />easement be taken for the retention pond, Cohen seconded. Ns. <br />Howell asked whether the shared driveway would be preferred in <br />the event Mr. Lauer agrees to Mr. Hauser's proposal for access to <br />Lauer's property? Kelley replied that would be preferred. Mr. <br />Hauser expressed his concern that such an access may interfere <br />with existing trees. Mr. Hauser expressed his confusion <br />regarding the intent of condition #1 of Hanson's motion. Hanson <br />clarified that it was his intention to allow Mr. Hauser the <br />option of slightly adjusting the lot line so the new driveway <br />could be accessed from the old driveway. Kelley explained that <br />the shared driveway would be preferred to avoid any additional <br />curb cuts onto North Ferndale Road. Motion, Ayes«6, Nays»0, <br />Motion passed. <br />\ <br />\