Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 17, 1989 <br />ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. <br />The Orono Planning Conunission met on the above date with the <br />following members present: Chairman Kelley; Planning Commission <br />members Johnson, Cohen, Hanson and Moos. Planning Commission <br />member Brown arrived at 7:15 p.m. The following represented the <br />City staff; Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant <br />Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Public Works Director <br />Gerhardson, City Engineer Representative Olson and City Recorder <br />Scheffler. Council Representative Alan Nettles attended and <br />CounciImember Goetten was also present. <br />CONSENT AGENDA <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Johnson, to approve the consent agenda. Motion, <br />Ayes=®5, Nays=0, Motion passed. <br />#1397 THE ART CENTER OP MINNESOTA <br />2180 & 2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE _ _ <br />CLASS I SUBDIVISION - LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 P.M. TO 7:13 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Ms. Mary Smith was present as a representative for the Art <br />Center. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Art Center was <br />seeking a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement as part of the <br />sale of the Old Hill School. Lot 5 will be doubled in size from <br />13,760 s.f. to 27,600 s.f. Staff is recommending that a 10* <br />setback be maintained from the tennis court to the new division <br />line rather than 1* as being proposed. The Art Center will lose <br />22 parking stalls as a result of the subdivision, which will <br />leave them with 50. The City Engineer has indicated that he <br />would be comfortable with 60 parking stalls and staff is <br />recommending that 10 additional stalls within the southwest <br />parking area be provided now and will reserve the right to <br />request more if needed. <br />Chairman Kelley expressed his concern of continued use of <br />the parking area to the rear of the Old Hill School. It was his <br />belief that parking in that area would continue and cause <br />trespassing upon the property which would then be used as a <br />single family residence. Ms. Smith indicated that there was a <br />possible option of allowing the lease of the tennis court in <br />exchange for available parking in the rear of the Old Hill <br />School. Kelley informed Ms. Smith that the City would not allow <br />commercial parking on residential property. <br />Planning Commissioners Moos and Johnson concurred that the <br />tennis court be 10* from the side lot line. Planning <br />Commissioners Hanson and Cohen questioned whether the tennis <br />court should be removed. Ms. Smith stated that it would be a