My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
05-22-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 9:16:32 AM
Creation date
4/15/2025 9:15:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE #1388>BERTELSON CONTINUED <br />structures until the Council has had an opportunity to consider <br />the amendment, not to exceed three months. CounciImember Goetten <br />asked whether the Council could legally place a moratorium on <br />building accessory structures. City Attorney Barrett, said that <br />the Council had a right to pass an ordinance imposing a <br />moratorium, except in cases where preliminary approval of a <br />subdivision had been given. CounciImember Callahan amended hie <br />motion to pass an ordinance to place a moratorium on building <br />accessory structures. CounciImember Goetten seconded. Gaffron <br />informed the Council that Mr. Bertelson's accessory structure <br />wo’ild fall within the limitations of the amendment as it is <br />currently drafter. As long as Mr. Bertelson meets the hardcover <br />standards, under the amended ordinance, a variance will not be <br />required. Callahan indicated that he would prefer to review the <br />ordinance amendment. Planning Commission Representative Hanson <br />said that the Planning Commission had been concerned about the <br />hardcover issue should there be a future request to expand the <br />residence. Bernhardson suggested that the moratorium apply to <br />accessory structures in excess of 500 s.f. Notion, Ayes^S, <br />Nays~0, Motion passed. <br />«1389 JAMES/CHARLENE MARDOCK <br />68C DAKOTA AVENUE <br />AinPH-THE-FACT VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2631 <br />Mr. Mardock was present fer this matter. <br />Planning Commission Representative Hanson stated that he is <br />a neighbor of the Mardocks. He confirmed that the existing deck <br />is located and configured approximately the same as the pre <br />existing deck. <br />Mr. Mardock said that the house was built close to the lot <br />line. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />clarified that the codes had been revised since the time the <br />Mardock*s residence was built. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember <br />Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2631, approving the after-the-fact <br />rear yard setback variance. Motion, Ayes«5, Nays=0, Motion <br />passed. <br />#1392 KIM EDWARDS <br />2450 NOODHAVEN DRIVE <br />AFTER-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />RESOLUTION #2632 <br />Mr. Edwards was present for this matter. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron depicted <br />the area to the east of the house where fill had been placed. <br />The fill has overflowed onto the adjacent property and the City <br />Engineer has recommended that the fill be pulled back. The City <br />Engineer is also recommending that there be no fill placed in the <br />drainage area to the rear of the lot. The Planning Comroissif^n
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.