My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
05-22-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 9:16:32 AM
Creation date
4/15/2025 9:15:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OP OROHO <br />P. O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />473-7357 <br />ZONING FILS #1400 <br />NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />Date of Notice: May 19, 1989 <br />COPIES TO: <br />Mr. and Mrs. Charles Larson <br />4285 6th Avenue North <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />TYPE OF APPLICATION: XXXX Variance <br />_ _ Conditional Use Permit <br />_ _ Subdivision <br />Other <br />DATE OF MEETING: 5/15/89 VOTE: For: <br />Planning Coraiission recoamends the following: <br />_ _ Approval as submitted <br />_ _ Approval subject to conditions noted below <br />Denial for reasons noted below <br />6; Against: 0 <br />XXXX Tabled for reasons noted below <br />_ _ No action required <br />NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: <br />In light of your reaction of "disappo;’ntment" at the May meeting of <br />the Planning Commission, it is hoped the following comments will <br />provide background and a clearer perspective of the review of your <br />varia ice application. <br />The Orono Planning Commission has been working on a major ordinance <br />amendment for accessory structures since the first scheduled public <br />hearing in July of 1987. All work on that ordinance amenIment and <br />other amendments of the Zonin^ Code ceased in the late summer of 1988 <br />when all planning efforts were refocused on a Planned Dnit Development <br />and Highway Commercial District Ordinance for the Highway 12 Corridor. <br />An interim ordinance (moratorium) had never been considered since that <br />public hearing and the City staff has continued to accept variance <br />applications. <br />In fact a similar varii.nce application was reviewed by the City at a <br />previous Planning Commission Meeting, at which staff advises that you, <br />Mrs. Larson, attended. That earlier application was tabled at the May <br />8th Council Meeting because it appeared that the Planning Commission <br />was reaching a resolve of the issue of the relationship of allowed <br />size of an accessory structure to the area of a property. The setback <br />standards appeared to never be an issue, as all agreed that an <br />oversized accessory structure must meet the principal structure <br />(residence) setback for the zoning d’strict.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.