Laserfiche WebLink
30. City policy regarding the separation of unsewerd, <br />undeveloped, substandard, contiguous lots in common owner*- <br />ship was clearly defined by an action of the City Council in <br />1981, in which the separation of a developed 1.4 acre lot <br />from the adjacent vacant 1.7 acre, 120.3 foot wide vacant <br />lot in the LR-IA, 2-acre, 200 foot width, unsewered zone was <br />denied. (Application #635, Council action to conceptually <br />deny on October 26, 1981, based on a) lack of demonstrated <br />hardship; b) no sanitary sewer available; c) insufficient <br />area; d) insufficient width.) <br />31. The 1984 Zoning Code amendments included the addition <br />of Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (C), which prohibited the <br />"transfer or sale of non-conforming, undeveloped lots not <br />served by public sanitary sewer, aligned in a contiguous <br />arrangement, undivided by a public or private road or road <br />easement and under same or common ownership" unless <br />specifically approved by the City Council, or unless the <br />resulting lots satisfy the area and width requirements of <br />the Zoning Code. No performance standards for approval of <br />such transfers appear in the code. <br />32. At least 13 properties or groups of properties in a <br />situation similar to Ferrell's with a high potential for <br />request of similar variances have been identified within the <br />City of Orono. <br />33. Since January 1, 1975, when the 2 acre RR-lB zoning <br />district became effective, no permits have been issued for <br />new residences on commonly owned substandard lots in the RR- <br />lB district. Of 153 new residence permits issued in the PR- <br />IB district from 1/1/75 to 5/1/86, 145 permits were issued <br />for conforming lots, 7 permits were issued for substandard <br />lots of record in single separate ownership due to the <br />inability of applicants to combine or acquire additional <br />land to create conforming lots, and 1 permit was issued to <br />demolish and rebuild on a substandard single separate <br />ownership lot where a house was already existing. The Citj <br />of Orono has consistently denied permits for substandard <br />lots owned in common with adjacent developed lots in the RR- <br />lB district. <br />34. The City Council has always required that when two or <br />more unsewered lots are owned in common, each lot must <br />individually meet or exceed the requirements of the Zoning <br />Code before any of the lots can be built upon and that two <br />or more substandard lots owned in commmon must be combined <br />so that the resulting combined lot meets the requirements of <br />the Zoning Code before the lots can be built upon. <br />Page 10 of 13