05-08-1989 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OP THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP APRIL 24, 1989 explanations for the falsification. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Goetten, to allow a representative from Ingleside Engineering the opportunity to be present at the May 0, 1989 Council Meeting and make any statements on their behalf regarding falsification of information. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays=0, Motion passed. NAVARRE REDEVELOPMENT City Administrator Bernhardson requested an appropriate date for meeting with the Planning Commission and John Shardlow to review the work that has been done regarding Navarre Planning. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to place this item on the agenda for the upcoming joint meeting to determine a date for the Council and Planning Commission to meet with John Shardlow regarding Navarre Redevelopment. Motion, Ayes=5, Nay®0, Motion passed. 1989 POLICE SETTLEMENT It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Peterson, to agree to the terms of settlemenc outlined in Attachment B. Motion, Ayes=5, Nays*0, Motion passed. 1989 SALARV ADJUSTMENT RESOLUTION #2627 Counci1member Goetten questioned why the City Administrator's employment contract had not come before them since it was due to expire April 30, 1989. Mayor Grabek said that he had put that off due to CounciImember Goetten's indication that she needed some questions answered. Goetten stated that she did not think her questions had anything to do with the City Administrator's Contract. Goetten questioned whether there would be any problem in having the City Administrator working after his contract expired? City Attorney Barrett stated that he had not seen the contract, but he assumed that the City Administrator would continue tc act in that capacity and that the contract negotiations would be pending and his benefits and salary would remain the same until the renewal. Grabek asked Barrett to review the contract and inform him prior to May 1st if any other action would be necessary. Grabek said that a copy of the contract could be given to all CounciImembers, along with a proposal of justification, so the matter can be discussed at the May 8, Council Meeting. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember Nettles, to adopt Attachment B as the revised 1989 Salary Resolution #2627, together with adopting of Attachment C as the revised 1989 Pay Plan Sched-ile for the Compensation Plan applicable to persons employed on the date of adoption of these revisions. Motion, Ayes-3, Petersen, Goetten, Nay. CounciImember Peterson felt that since there were no objections regarc.ing the 3% increase that there was no need for the additional .5% increase. CounciImember Goetten was concerned about the precedent setting that may occur by giving an extra percent increase to one group and then having to give it to the