My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
05-08-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2025 11:56:02 AM
Creation date
4/14/2025 11:52:40 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
473
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTBS OF THE PIANMIH6 COMMISSION MBBTING APRIL 17, 1989 <br />ZONING PILE #1388-BERTBLSON CONTINnED <br />that he had no intention to do any of those things. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown told Mr. Bertelson that he would <br />have no objections to a three-car garage, as long as it was one <br />story. Mr. Bertelson explained that the garage would tuck into <br />the hillside. Planning Commissioner Hanson said that he would <br />approve a two story garage that was 24* x 36 Kelley <br />interjected that Mr. Bertelson could build a 24* x 24* and put a <br />car or boat on the second level and still have 1/2 of that level <br />for his woodworking. Planning Commissioner Cohen said that in <br />his opinion, the structure was too lai.ge and would set a <br />precedent if approved. <br />Planning Commissioner Johnson asked if there would not be a <br />problem with the garage interfering with the catch basin and <br />storm sewer? Gaffron explained that the City Engineer had taken <br />a look at the situation, and felt there would be no problem with <br />rerouting the drainage. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Moos, to recommend approval of only a 24* x 24* 2- <br />story structure. Brown indicated that he would allow the <br />applicant the ability to build the structure up to the 1,000 s.f. <br />standard. Kelley pointed out that 24* x 24* would allow the <br />.applicant more than 1,000 s.f. Motion, Ayes»3, Johnson, Hanson, <br />Cohen, Nay. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Johnson, to recommend denial of the <br />accessory structure in excess of 1,000 s.f. Hanson stated th^^ <br />allowing only 1,000 s.f. would result in poor utilization <br />floor space. He said Mr. Bertelson had a unique situation <br />because the topography necessitates a 2-story walkout situation <br />for the structure and the need to store 3 vehicles is easiest all <br />on the same floor. Johnson stated that by allowing the 24* x 40* <br />structure, the applicant would be very limited should he decide <br />to add on to his house in the future. Motion, Ayes»5, Hanson, <br />V4 <br />#1389 JAMBS ft CHARLENE MARDOCX <br />880 DAKOTA AVENUE <br />AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:45 P.M. TO 8:50 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />liXy noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Mardock were present for this application. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />explained that this application involved an after-the-fact <br />request for a rear setback variance for a deck. The new deck is
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.