Laserfiche WebLink
WILLIAM F. ROTTSCHAEFER. JR. <br />Attomty at L$w <br />6200 SHINOLB CRBEK PARKWAY. SUITS 41S <br />MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA SS430 <br />6I2/S«6*103a <br />f <br />!r.*N- <br />January 19, 1988 <br />Mr. Mark Bemhardson <br />City Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />P. 0. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />s : 1 <br />JAN2 0 5'.9 ' ;ii! <br />Re:Request for Vacation of Excess Right of Way <br />for Spring Hill Road <br />Dear Mr. Bemhardson: <br />I recently have had several conversations with Mr. Mike Gaffron concerning <br />For your assistance and convenience, I enclose photo copies of the ^^If <br />section sheet showing the property and of aThe legal description of the property is that part of the ^o^^^^est 1/4 ot t e <br />Southwest 1/4 of Section 25, Township 1^8, Range 23 lying <br />the centerline of County Road No. 6, and the West 30 feet of that part of the <br />Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 25 lying <br />the centerline of said County Road No. 6. The property25-118-23-33-0003 and the parcel contains 4.84 acres according to the records <br />of the City Assessor. <br />What we are requesting Is the total or partial vacation of a highway <br />easement which encumbers an additional forty feet of the <br />thp thirty-three feet (on each side of the centerline) normally encumbered by <br />^reetra^d rolds The easement was acquired In 1925 by Hennepin County for <br />then existing County Road No. 6 (now Spring Hill Road); It encumbers all t <br />portion of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25 lying within <br />seventy-three feet of and Southeasterly of the centerline of County Joad No. <br />P5tabl1shed April 27, 1925 by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin <br />County”. Exactly why the additional forty feet was acquired <br />■It ■!<; clpar the road does not occupy It, but the fact of the matter Is that <br />still eilsts and encumbers far more of the subject property than <br />for road purposes. Because the easement Is described by reference to a 1925 <br />centerline and because that centerline is actually somewhat to the West of the <br />r.ntPrHne fas shown on the half section sheet and survey), the <br />additional right of way does not actually affect as much of the subject proper y