My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1980-1989 Microfilm
>
1989
>
04-24-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 2:25:14 PM
Creation date
4/7/2025 2:21:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
532
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OP THE ORORO COUNCIL MEETING OP APRIL 10, 1989 <br />COUNTY ROAD 51 CONTINUED <br />hazard existing in this location, especially if a child should be <br />struck by a car. <br />David Singer informed the Council that he had been told that <br />if Hennepin County deemed County Road 51 to be a safety problem, <br />the DNR would not be concerned about losing the parking spaces; <br />however, the County did not say that the Road was a safety <br />problem. He was under the impression that the County Engineer <br />did not want the responsibility of classifying County Road 51 as <br />a safety hazard. Chief Kilbo interjected that he had never seen <br />a County vehicle surveying the site to determine whether the Road <br />was safe or not. Singer went on to say that Mr. Murphy told him <br />that enforcement of no parking designations would fall withir <br />local jurisdiction. <br />CounciImember Goettsn recommended the removal of four <br />parking spaces along the curve to improve sight lines and <br />requested that the Police Department perform a speed survey in <br />that area. Mayor Grabek asked if it would be difficult to <br />enforce no parking in those four slots. Public Works Director <br />Gerhardson said that it would be necessary to put "hash marks" <br />and signage indicating that parking is not allowed. <br />Mr. Singer did not feel that eliminating four parking slots <br />would solve the safety problem. It was his belief that the <br />shoulder needed to be widened if any parking was going to be <br />allowed in that area. Counci Imember Callahan questioned why the <br />City did not include that es an option? Bernhardson said it was <br />due to the need to further encroach into the private lakeshore <br />property; he had received communciation from residents opposing <br />such a plan. <br />CounciImember Callahan suggested that parking could be <br />eliminated entirely until such time that the DNR requests more <br />parking be made available. Mayor Grabek expressed his concern <br />over those residents that would object to the elimination of <br />parking. Callahan suggested taking a survey of the residents to <br />find out how many would oppose no parking. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember <br />Nettles, to request from the Engineers and Police Department an <br />appropriate number of spots to be eliminated and justfication for <br />eliminating those spots. That information is to be brought back <br />to the April 24th Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes*4, Nays«0, <br />Motion passed. <br />COUNTY ROAD 116 <br />City Administrator Bernhardson said that the last time this <br />matter was before the Council, County Commissioner Jude was <br />present. Since that time, he had sent a letter to Bernhardson <br />saying that the County would respect the wishes of each <br />community. Mr. Jude had also met with Medina citizens in <br />opposition to County Road 116 and told them that if they could <br />convince the Medina City Council to be opposed to the project it
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.