My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1980-1989 Microfilm
>
1989
>
04-24-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 2:25:14 PM
Creation date
4/7/2025 2:21:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
532
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF . dE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OP APRIL 10, 1989 <br />ZONING PILE #1353-PIEBBLKORN CONTINUED <br />application is submitted and approved within six months. Motion, <br />Ayes*4, Nays=0, Motion passed. <br />PLANNED DEVELOPMENT <br />ORDINANCE <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that he was <br />presenting a revision to the original draft that would limit the <br />use of the Planned Development Ordinance strictly to the Highway <br />12 Corridor. Under the category of special requirements, <br />limitations could be placed on a conventional zoning application <br />that would require the applicant to meet all standards. There is <br />also the need to get a clarification on the term "drive-thru" <br />businesses. The main issue yet to be resolved i* how to address <br />standards and reference existing zoning. Bernhardson said that <br />he had been working with the City Attorney regarding this matter. <br />It was his recommendation that the Planned Development Ordinance <br />language reference each of the individual zones. <br />It was moved by CounciImember Callahan, seconded by Mayor <br />Grabek, to give conceptual approval to the adoption of the <br />Planned Development Ordinance, limiting it to the Highway 12 <br />Corridor, and request that staff bring forth the language <br />necessary to finalize the adoption. CounciImember Goetten <br />expressed her concern regarding the "drive-thru" aspect of the B- <br />6 zoning, and questioned what "restaurant one" would refer to. <br />She did not want to see a drive-in restaurant in that area. <br />Motion, Ayes=4, Nays»0, Motion passed. <br />ENGINEER'S REPORT <br />None <br />MAYOR'S REPORT: <br />PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIBWS/APPOINTMENT <br />Mr. Stephen Johnston and Mr. John B. Thiessc, candidates for <br />the Planning Commission terms that expired March 31, 1989, were <br />present and briefly addressed the Council. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember <br />Goetten, to accept Stephen Johnston and John Thiesse as <br />candidates and table this item until the April 24, 1989 Council <br />Meeting. Motion, Ayes=4, Nays=0, Motion passed. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION/COUNCIL JOINT MEKTTNG <br />It was agreed that in addition to July 29th, there would be <br />a joint meeting of the Council and Planning Commission on <br />Thursday, May 4th. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by CounciImember <br />Goetten, to select 5/4/89 as the joint meeting of the Planning <br />Commission and Council and that CounclImembers communicate <br />desired topics to staff prior to the Council's April 24, 1989 <br />meeting so that the agenda for the joint meeting can be adopted <br />by Council. Motion, Ayes=4, Nays-0, Motion passed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.