Laserfiche WebLink
JOB RAnSCHBNDORFBR <br />^aSSSySHORBLlliB DRIVE <br />^ VlA^ANCB <br />^PUBLIC HEARING 8:12-8:30 ^ ^ <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />were noted. <br />Gaffron explained that that applicants were encouraged <br />by staff to submit a variance application since the <br />upgrade of Cty. Rd. 15 will have a major effect on <br />existing structures and fence on theii property. The <br />applicants existing planter box will be removed as part <br />of the Cty. Rd. 15 construction which will be replaced <br />by the County, but only to the extent approved by the <br />City of Or<"no. Part of the planter box and most of the <br />fence are within the county road right of way. <br />Applicant requests direction as to what restoration is <br />allowable and how high a fence will be allowed. <br />Additionally, applicant is proposing a phased upgrade, <br />beginning in 1989, of the existing house including the <br />reconstruction of foundation walls and construction of <br />an addition on the lake side of the house and <br />construction of an attached garage. <br />Joe and Sandy Rauschendorfer were present for this <br />matter and reviewed their future plans and stages to be <br />done. Regarding the replacement of the fence^ applicant <br />would like to constru'-*- a 6* high privacy fence. <br />Chairman Kelley felt that because applicants do not <br />intend to start work until 1989, Planning Commission <br />should only address the planter box and fence issue a <br />this time. <br />Mr. Rav ichendorfer stated that they would like some <br />conceptual direction from the Planning Commission <br />regarding the extent they can use their property in <br />order to decide if they want to remain living there. <br />Chairman Kelley stated his major concern wch any <br />property improvements would be staying within the <br />existing or less hardcover amounts. <br />Regarding the proposed garage. Planning Commission felt <br />the 10' structure-to structure-setback was necessary ?or <br />safet' asons. <br />Mr. Ra».^chendorfer stated that in order to build an <br />.dequate sized garage with turn around the required 10* <br />structure-to-structure setback could not be maintained. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />£XH=o-:r <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 18, 1988