My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
04-10-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2025 9:31:14 AM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:01:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
552
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Orono City Council <br />April 10, 1989 <br />Page 2 <br />of any tenant of mine who might have an obligation to rebuild) <br />and naturally a future buyer who might have a use in mind <br />different than a garden center. <br />Conditional uses in such a zone should then be the more <br />problematic uses which you presently envision. By specifying <br />that those problematic uses are subject to the conditional use <br />permit process, you may then at the time that such use is <br />proposed add conditions to protect city interests. <br />By contrast, planned unit development regulations are normally <br />reserved for custom developments in commercial zones where <br />neither the permitted uses, nor the conditional uses with <br />conditions, can accommodate the proposed project. Even planned <br />unit development regulations are an overlay over specific <br />u .derlying commercial zoning standards such that both the <br />applicant and the city understand the underlying conditions of <br />zoning. If such conditions cannot be complied with, only then do <br />the custom zoning provisions of the PUD concept come into play. <br />As a third line of defense, the city should provide PUD <br />availability in this zone to accommodate unusual (multi-use), <br />burdensome (too big a project), oddly configured (clustered), or <br />other proposals. <br />In the case of my garden center, there are no unusual, burdensome <br />or oddly configured aspects to my plan and therefore no planned <br />unit development concept is necessary for me and, in fairness, <br />you are not entitled to any special restrictions. The usual <br />zoning controls in a permitted commercial use are more than <br />adequate. Conditional use and PUD provisions will protect you <br />against future changed uses which are more problematic. <br />Please remember after all that at my expense I will be installing <br />sewer and water, paying taxes at commercial rates, and cor.plying <br />with all of your other commercial zoning regulations. I*m not <br />asking for a higher density of land use, a greater height of <br />buildings, a drastic cut-back in required parking, favorable <br />treatment with regard to neighbors, or ar** other custom factor <br />which would give rise to fairly entitling you to impose the <br />restrictions of a planned unit development on this project to my <br />extreme detriment with lenders, tenants, or future buyers. <br />I view the land, its rezoning to commerical use, and my putting <br />it to not only a reasonable commercial use, but one quite <br />compatible with the residential neighbors to the north, as such <br />an advantage to the city that the city should swiftly take the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.